Gribz 846 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 What "last game" are you talking about? He was utter, utter shite agaist Celtic at Ibrox. Miller's a liability! Sorry was talking about the last game at parkhead 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Miller had the luxury of having a very on-form Cousin playing beside him at Parkhead. You think he would be as effective with Lafferty ? Sorry Gribz but your disapproval of Boyd is clouding your judgement. You would prefer we played Miller up top against Celtic rather then Boyd because Boyd doesn't score against Celtic ? Miller has gone 9 games now without scoring - so you want him to be our main goal threat ? I am sure Celtic would be shiteing themselves at the thought :yawn: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 846 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Miller had the luxury of having a very on-form Cousin playing beside him at Parkhead. You think he would be as effective with Lafferty ? Sorry Gribz but your disapproval of Boyd is clouding your judgement. You would prefer we played Miller up top against Celtic rather then Boyd because Boyd doesn't score against Celtic ? Miller has gone 9 games now without scoring - so you want him to be our main goal threat ? I am sure Celtic would be shiteing themselves at the thought :yawn: Cousin wasnt on form, he just turned it on for 1 game, he came in for that game out of nowhere and showed the other strikers how to play. If you asked the Celtic defence who they would rather play against they would probably say either. 1) Boyd wont make them sweat and 2) Millers form wont trouble them. Personally id play neither! If Novo makes it id go with him and Lafferty, but if it is 4-5-1 then Miller would start ahead of Boyd anyday of the week. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavin3084 0 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Bring back cousin!!!!!!!!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon 0 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Cousin wasnt on form, he just turned it on for 1 game, he came in for that game out of nowhere and showed the other strikers how to play. If you asked the Celtic defence who they would rather play against they would probably say either. 1) Boyd wont make them sweat and 2) Millers form wont trouble them. Personally id play neither! If Novo makes it id go with him and Lafferty, but if it is 4-5-1 then Miller would start ahead of Boyd anyday of the week. Yeah but you would never say any different though would you. Like Craig, I'm baffled at your constant want of leaving out the most lethal striker in the SPL! I'd like to try Boyd and Lafferty, Novo has already been ruled out I believe. IF it's a 4-4-2 which unfortunately, I think is unlikely, iut would probably be Boyd and Miller. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I still wouldnt be surprised to see us play 4-4-2. We have played better than them in both games this season with a 4-4-2 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 4-4-2 with Boyd & Naisy or Lafferty up front & they'll be squirming from Parkhead to Lourdes!!! :box: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon 0 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I think we're all hoping it's 442 Craig and we have definitely played better than them both games so far. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Personally i would prefer two smaller fast players up front as i think caldwell and McAnus love to see Boyd in the starting line up. I would go 4-5-1\4-3-3 Playing: Davis------Mendes-------Fergie-------Neighsmith ---------------------Fleck--------------- ----------------Novo(1)\Miller(2) Lafferty(3)Boyd(4) We need speed up front not Height imo. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon 0 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I just cant agree Pete and probably unlikely to until Boyd shows a severe lack/dip in form. He's our best goal threat regardless of his shortcomings (which he has worked on and improved). With Novo out, I'd rather Lafferty (maybe to early) or Naismith. Him and Boyd had a great partnership at Killie iirc 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.