craig 5,199 Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 But to match the JJB deal they only have to pay the �£3M a year for a contract that was previously worth �£5M. Perhaps we could get �£4M and be �£1M better off per year. I doubt that anyone will come forward with that money. It wasnt 5 mill a year either was it ? Unless you are counting the up-front payment too. Over the 10 years it was set at 4.8 mill a year, right ? 18 mill up front and then 3 mill per year for 10 years. Is that right ? It is all a guessing game right now as there isn't evidence either way to suggest that we would get a better, or worse, deal. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,552 Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 The ref must have agreed with you! :devil: Boooooo! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,614 Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 I doubt anyone in the current climate would guarantee us an annual income. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Ok, but the point is we only need to hit 3M a year to earn the 4.8M due to the money up front. We're guaranteed a minimum of 1.8M even if we sell nothing... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Ok, but the point is we only need to hit 3M a year to earn the 4.8M due to the money up front. We're guaranteed a minimum of 1.8M even if we sell nothing... We have already blown that 1.8M *10 years of cash though as that was the up front payment amount. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.