Zappa 0 Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 We didn't pay that much for Velicka, so I'd guess that he was brought in as back up incase we got a couple of 1st choice strikers injured. Want a nice wee 'conspiricy' theory Super_Ally? Maybe Velicka was only brought in to piss off Romanov. Same could be said of Webster. :devil: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ascender 352 Posted January 6, 2009 Share Posted January 6, 2009 All conspiracy theories aside, its another strange situation at best. This is a player that our coaching staff would have been well aware of before signing him given his time in the SPL. I thought he looked quite promising in pre-season, but then sunk without really being given a chance. Taking all the above in to consideration, you then have to look at his fee which might not be a lot historically speaking, but in our current situation, it is a significant sum to be prepared to write off. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.