Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

I've just read the response on FF and I'm a bit disappointed by it tbh. Any attempts to find out what are going on seem to be getting brushed under the carpet. Which is fair enough if we say that the RST shouldn't be posting stuff on other websites about their affairs. But the Trust can't have it both ways can they and use sites like FF when it suits them?

 

I basically just want to know what's going on. A third of board members don't all choose to resign within days of each other for no reason. Or maybe they do and the Trust is about to step up a gear and that would call for more time. The cynic in me would suggest that these members didn't agree with the direction the Trust was going and decided to vote with their feet.

 

The Record piece is being blamed for de-stabilising the Trust, but IMO they've more than done that themselves with their silence since the resignations started. There was an EGM last night wasn't there? So are Trust members going to get an email today explaining what's going on?

I believe that there was a board meeting last night, not an EGM

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that there was a board meeting last night, not an EGM

 

Ah OK, I knew there was something lined up. Would it not have been normal to have called an EGM in the circumstances, maybe after resignation number 3 or therabouts?

 

Any way, I'm assuming we can expect an update today from the Trust whether its a press release or an email to members?

 

Or am I expecting too much?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 90minsofmadness
The new posts I've said today say this m8.

 

 

You havent quoted the responce today though. I have a feeling the Record has put that word in your mouth but as Frankie seems to be backing it up I'll keep my opinion to myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one you said wasn't true. :D

 

I said the reply wasn't true in so much as those that left - including me - were as much critics of the current regime as anyone else on the board.

 

I felt the reply to JK was suggesting those that left were incapable of being aggressive with regard to the club.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I said the reply wasn't true in so much as those that left - including me - were as much critics of the current regime as anyone else on the board.

 

I felt the reply to JK was suggesting those that left were incapable of being aggressive with regard to the club.

 

:)

I know, mate. I was just kidding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah OK, I knew there was something lined up. Would it not have been normal to have called an EGM in the circumstances, maybe after resignation number 3 or therabouts?

 

Any way, I'm assuming we can expect an update today from the Trust whether its a press release or an email to members?

 

Or am I expecting too much?

Given the notice period and organisation required, I would suggest that an EGM was not practical given the AGM is probably only 6-10 weeks away. They may look at moving it forward? I'm also not expecting any update today.

 

But I could be wrong on both counts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.