Bluedell 5,623 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 http://www.gersnetonline.net/vb/showpost.php?p=105468&postcount=16 The one you said wasn't true. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,623 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 I've just read the response on FF and I'm a bit disappointed by it tbh. Any attempts to find out what are going on seem to be getting brushed under the carpet. Which is fair enough if we say that the RST shouldn't be posting stuff on other websites about their affairs. But the Trust can't have it both ways can they and use sites like FF when it suits them? I basically just want to know what's going on. A third of board members don't all choose to resign within days of each other for no reason. Or maybe they do and the Trust is about to step up a gear and that would call for more time. The cynic in me would suggest that these members didn't agree with the direction the Trust was going and decided to vote with their feet. The Record piece is being blamed for de-stabilising the Trust, but IMO they've more than done that themselves with their silence since the resignations started. There was an EGM last night wasn't there? So are Trust members going to get an email today explaining what's going on? I believe that there was a board meeting last night, not an EGM 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ascender 352 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 I believe that there was a board meeting last night, not an EGM Ah OK, I knew there was something lined up. Would it not have been normal to have called an EGM in the circumstances, maybe after resignation number 3 or therabouts? Any way, I'm assuming we can expect an update today from the Trust whether its a press release or an email to members? Or am I expecting too much? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 90minsofmadness Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 The new posts I've said today say this m8. You havent quoted the responce today though. I have a feeling the Record has put that word in your mouth but as Frankie seems to be backing it up I'll keep my opinion to myself. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,552 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 The one you said wasn't true. I said the reply wasn't true in so much as those that left - including me - were as much critics of the current regime as anyone else on the board. I felt the reply to JK was suggesting those that left were incapable of being aggressive with regard to the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,552 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 You havent quoted the responce today though. I have a feeling the Record has put that word in your mouth but as Frankie seems to be backing it up I'll keep my opinion to myself. Yes, he did mate.... http://www.gersnetonline.net/vb/showpost.php?p=105468&postcount=16 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,623 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 I said the reply wasn't true in so much as those that left - including me - were as much critics of the current regime as anyone else on the board. I felt the reply to JK was suggesting those that left were incapable of being aggressive with regard to the club. I know, mate. I was just kidding. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,552 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 I know, mate. I was just kidding. I'm not in a joking mood today... :cheers: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 90minsofmadness Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 Yes, he did mate.... http://www.gersnetonline.net/vb/showpost.php?p=105468&postcount=16 He says along the lines of, I doubt that the RST would have used the word militant. If they did then they are asking for trouble. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,623 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 Ah OK, I knew there was something lined up. Would it not have been normal to have called an EGM in the circumstances, maybe after resignation number 3 or therabouts? Any way, I'm assuming we can expect an update today from the Trust whether its a press release or an email to members? Or am I expecting too much? Given the notice period and organisation required, I would suggest that an EGM was not practical given the AGM is probably only 6-10 weeks away. They may look at moving it forward? I'm also not expecting any update today. But I could be wrong on both counts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.