craig 5,199 Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 craig: I can see your point actually but in some ways the rules for this kind of coverage have already been made. Yes, in an ideal world, it would be great to concentrate on Rangers only (in a positive sense) but that can mean statements are bland and won't be picked up by the media. Fact is - even if the media do run with it (unlikely given the positive RFC nature of the message) the would edit out the negative stuff anyway. Moreover, many elements in the media have already made up their minds on what we're about so a subtle dig won't change their contempt. It's all part of the game and why shouldn't we take the moral high ground given the opportunity. No-one else lets us. I agree completely with you Frankie with the exception of your last sentence. Sorry but I disagree that by having subtle digs at your arch enemies is taking the moral high ground. It isn't taking the moral high ground but stooping to their level. As I said originally, I am all for everything the Trust do and periodically having a sly wee dig at Celtic is fine and dandy (as well as amusing and also sometimes appropriate) but when it creeps into most, if not all, press releases then, in my humble opinion, it dilutes the power and reputation of the RST. As I said, I like the subtle digs - but I do think we should take the moral high ground on some of these things. Let the Tims keep their paranoia. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.