CammyF 9,368 Posted Friday at 18:51 Share Posted Friday at 18:51 1 hour ago, RANGERRAB said: Bain was posted missing before & after Whyte came in and subsequently binned him. At least Paul Murray called out whyte before he took over but was ignored by everyone including Murray & the SFA But prior to SDM selling the club to Whyte, he was actively tackling the debt. That's undeniable. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 4,080 Posted Friday at 19:47 Share Posted Friday at 19:47 52 minutes ago, CammyF said: But prior to SDM selling the club to Whyte, he was actively tackling the debt. That's undeniable. Bain was cannon fodder for liewell who was by now in cahoots with the SFA and SPL. Who can forget that SC replay at CP with all those red cards. We needed a much stronger CEO back then 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 9,368 Posted Friday at 20:08 Share Posted Friday at 20:08 19 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said: Bain was cannon fodder for liewell who was by now in cahoots with the SFA and SPL. Who can forget that SC replay at CP with all those red cards. We needed a much stronger CEO back then No, we needed someone who could eradicate the debt, that was Bain's priority and he was achieving that. FFS old Cammy is going mental at "now" Cammy for defending Bain 😀 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fa1833 372 Posted yesterday at 06:00 Share Posted yesterday at 06:00 (edited) The ruthlessness and the effectiveness of potentially what’s to come from our new investors. Whether you agree or not Farke isn’t the correct man for the job in the PL as stats go, it also seems like the investors are all about stats and performances whilst also making sure everyone is happy and being listened to. https://apple.news/AcI96Tn4pRW6FqFJdu28RvQ Edited yesterday at 06:02 by Fa1833 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,913 Posted yesterday at 07:48 Share Posted yesterday at 07:48 Fans who want all these different formations and most end up with one centre forward/striker in my day we had numbers 7,8,9,10,and 11 and all were strikers right wing inside right centre forward inside left left wing it’s a simple game hard by managers who think they know a better way and they are all wrong. KEEP IT SIMPLE should be the message 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fa1833 372 Posted yesterday at 08:05 Share Posted yesterday at 08:05 10 minutes ago, compo said: Fans who want all these different formations and most end up with one centre forward/striker in my day we had numbers 7,8,9,10,and 11 and all were strikers right wing inside right centre forward inside left left wing it’s a simple game hard by managers who think they know a better way and they are all wrong. KEEP IT SIMPLE should be the message Exactly stick to what the players know and the reasons in why they love playing football , I strongly believe that soon as a manager comes in and starts complicating things with there tactics , yes some players love the routine and the tactics but most of the time they just revolt and refuse to perform and pick up a wage at the expense of the club and frustration to us fans. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,701 Posted yesterday at 10:26 Share Posted yesterday at 10:26 2 hours ago, compo said: we had numbers 7,8,9,10,and 11 and all were strikers right wing inside right centre forward inside left left wing As in league goals scored 1960/61, i.e. excluding cup-ties. Scott 12 McMillan 8 Millar 10 Brand 24 Wilson 19 31 goals from the wingers. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,610 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 22 hours ago, CammyF said: But prior to SDM selling the club to Whyte, he was actively tackling the debt. That's undeniable. In 2009 he was TOLD by the bank to take measures. He stood down from an active role and the bank had Donald Muir come in to make sure things were kept under relative control. The very first leak by Charlotte Fakes was a 2009 email between Sir Duped (using an alias) and Jack Irvine. Subject was Craig Whyte and his internet history. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 4,165 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago ... BTW, Whyte was chased by HMRC before he set a foot back into Scotland's world of football. He should not have been able to do anything business-wise, yet, HMRC did nothing, even when he bought us. Ex-Rangers owner Craig Whyte was being chased by the taxman for £3.74m BEFORE he started his catastrophic reign at Ibrox HMRC had instructed debt enforcers to chase Whyte with a bill for almost £4million and threaten him with bankruptcy in May 2011 - the same month that he bought Rangers. Keith Jackson 07:30, 05 Aug 2014 Updated 07:39, 05 Aug 2014 THE taxman was chasing Craig Whyte for £3.7million before he took over Rangers. HMRC focused on Whyte’s personal finances and made several failed attempts to get him to pay his dues before, during and after his catastrophic reign at Ibrox. The taxman regarded Whyte as a “flight risk”, fearing he might flee the country without settling his huge tax bill. Documents seen by the Record show: * The authorities instructed debt enforcers to chase Whyte with a bill for almost £4million and threaten him with bankruptcy in May 2011, the same month that he bought Rangers. * It was the culmination of a probe begun the previous year when the taxman learned Whyte had returned to the UK in 2005. * Whyte was continually warned he was failing to submit satisfactory tax returns and risked being fined. * He actually claimed at one stage to have a UK taxable worth of just £24 in accrued bank interest. * Yet when he struck the notorious deal with Ticketus for funds to finance his Rangers takeover, he gave the firm a personal guarantee he was worth nearly £33million. This “guarantee”, which was obtained by HMRC, helped them calculate Whyte’s £3,741,835.29 tax bill but he continued stalling tactics to avoid coughing up. At the same time he was able to run up a further £15million in unpaid taxes and penalties during his nine months in charge of Rangers. Whyte had bought Rangers for £1 from Sir David Murray in May 2011, while agreeing to wipe out the club’s £18million debts. ... From the DR back then. (just for reference) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,913 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Wonder if the yanks are having second thoughts 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.