CammyF 9,351 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, RANGERRAB said: Bain was posted missing before & after Whyte came in and subsequently binned him. At least Paul Murray called out whyte before he took over but was ignored by everyone including Murray & the SFA But prior to SDM selling the club to Whyte, he was actively tackling the debt. That's undeniable. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 4,069 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 52 minutes ago, CammyF said: But prior to SDM selling the club to Whyte, he was actively tackling the debt. That's undeniable. Bain was cannon fodder for liewell who was by now in cahoots with the SFA and SPL. Who can forget that SC replay at CP with all those red cards. We needed a much stronger CEO back then 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 9,351 Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 19 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said: Bain was cannon fodder for liewell who was by now in cahoots with the SFA and SPL. Who can forget that SC replay at CP with all those red cards. We needed a much stronger CEO back then No, we needed someone who could eradicate the debt, that was Bain's priority and he was achieving that. FFS old Cammy is going mental at "now" Cammy for defending Bain 😀 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fa1833 367 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago (edited) The ruthlessness and the effectiveness of potentially what’s to come from our new investors. Whether you agree or not Farke isn’t the correct man for the job in the PL as stats go, it also seems like the investors are all about stats and performances whilst also making sure everyone is happy and being listened to. https://apple.news/AcI96Tn4pRW6FqFJdu28RvQ Edited 6 hours ago by Fa1833 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,906 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Fans who want all these different formations and most end up with one centre forward/striker in my day we had numbers 7,8,9,10,and 11 and all were strikers right wing inside right centre forward inside left left wing it’s a simple game hard by managers who think they know a better way and they are all wrong. KEEP IT SIMPLE should be the message 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fa1833 367 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 10 minutes ago, compo said: Fans who want all these different formations and most end up with one centre forward/striker in my day we had numbers 7,8,9,10,and 11 and all were strikers right wing inside right centre forward inside left left wing it’s a simple game hard by managers who think they know a better way and they are all wrong. KEEP IT SIMPLE should be the message Exactly stick to what the players know and the reasons in why they love playing football , I strongly believe that soon as a manager comes in and starts complicating things with there tactics , yes some players love the routine and the tactics but most of the time they just revolt and refuse to perform and pick up a wage at the expense of the club and frustration to us fans. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,691 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, compo said: we had numbers 7,8,9,10,and 11 and all were strikers right wing inside right centre forward inside left left wing As in league goals scored 1960/61, i.e. excluding cup-ties. Scott 12 McMillan 8 Millar 10 Brand 24 Wilson 19 31 goals from the wingers. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.