Jump to content

 

 

New Policy to help Scottish clubs in Europe


Recommended Posts

On 04/04/2025 at 17:15, Bluedell said:

"Neoliberal (extreme capitalism)" or TV money as most of us would call it. 😂

Neoliberal (extreme capitalism) refers to an increased proportion of wealth (and political power) going to the few at the top of the tree.

 

We have clearly seen this happen over the past several decades in European football. 

 

You are obviously right in saying TV money has a lot to do with it. It is a mechanism to channel wealth.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, buster. said:

Neoliberal (extreme capitalism) refers to an increased proportion of wealth (and political power) going to the few at the top of the tree.

 

We have clearly seen this happen over the past several decades in European football. 

 

You are obviously right in saying TV money has a lot to do with it. It is a mechanism to channel wealth.

 

 

TV money has everything to do with it. For example pre-Sky football in the 90s Manchester United couldn't afford to compete with us over Archie Knox.

 

We were the richest club in Britain, capable of handling the champions of England and knocking them out of the Champions League.

 

Sky changed the scope of everything. Other countries giving large deals out for TV money to follow suit, some countries even getting state and royal funding, see Saudi, Spain etc.

 

Don't need to try and get political with it, TV money did it 😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said:

The O.P. didn't announce a new arrangement about the ownership of capital.

 

Neither did it announce the innovation of televised football matches.

 

It did announce a very specific rule change.

 

Just saying.

It was you who took that very specific and simple rule change and introduced the following......

 

 

"...Secondly smaller clubs have an interest in hindering bigger clubs getting into the group stages to reduce the size of the gap in revenue. The revenue gap is the main reason that we never see a non old firm team challenging for the league...

 

..There is an argument that this will benefit Rangers but it is short sighted. The immediate benefit would be qualifying for the group stages of the Champions League more often. That means more money which everyone thinks is great. The anti-competitive effects of the rule change mentioned above would make the domestic fixtures even less competitive. That is to say even more boring than at present. When the smaller clubs have less chance of beating the big clubs then you are more likely to see a team play defensively and waste time from the fifth minute. It's awful to watch...."

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, buster. said:

It was you who took that very specific and simple rule change and introduced the following......

You've highlighted some of the effects, which I expect, of the rule change.

 

I don't mention capital or television because neither has anything to do with the rule change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.