CammyF 8,585 Posted Tuesday at 20:10 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:10 6 hours ago, Graeme Ro55 said: I know the manner of SDM's departure is a sore topic, but he gave me many awesome Rangers memories. Waiting to see the transfer news when he was around was so exciting. Now we are greeted with the posibility of utter garbage like Ryan Porteous. SDM was just a man after all, and like the rest of us falable. Nope, not going to say what I've typed / deleted a few times. Deep breathing, deep breathing, move along Cammy, move along 😀 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,845 Posted Tuesday at 23:00 Share Posted Tuesday at 23:00 9 hours ago, CammyF said: Therein lies the problem. That structure was set up to ensure no one person should have an overall controlling interest. You can understand why after the spivs and Sir Duped. Would it not be better to have 1 or 2 individuals in control( via their shareholding) instead of half a dozen ? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,349 Posted yesterday at 08:13 Share Posted yesterday at 08:13 9 hours ago, RANGERRAB said: Would it not be better to have 1 or 2 individuals in control( via their shareholding) instead of half a dozen ? I'd rather have two dozen emotionally attached 'in a good way' than modern versions of Green and Whyte. If we are to become an attractive investment (other than to spivs) then we firstly have to get our finances sorted out. There is no immediate shortcut. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.933227737d9b1db3d025cd3f6cbbf371.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.