Rousseau 10,806 Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 Wage bill reduced from £41m to £35m. https://x.com/RangersReview55/status/1864665827120959660 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sutton_blows_goats 5,455 Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 11 minutes ago, Rousseau said: Wage bill reduced from £41m to £35m. https://x.com/RangersReview55/status/1864665827120959660 And think how much we will save on win bonuses with another season of winning nothing. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,806 Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 21 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said: And think how much we will save on win bonuses with another season of winning nothing. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,729 Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 1 hour ago, Rousseau said: Wage bill reduced from £41m to £35m. https://x.com/RangersReview55/status/1864665827120959660 Thought the wage bill was £61m? or is the £41m/£35m just playing staff? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,806 Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 1 hour ago, RANGERRAB said: Thought the wage bill was £61m? or is the £41m/£35m just playing staff? Yes, just playing staff. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,367 Posted December 6 Share Posted December 6 Do we know if the staff wage bill have been cut in line with the players? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,257 Posted December 6 Share Posted December 6 11 hours ago, RANGERRAB said: Thought the wage bill was £61m? or is the £41m/£35m just playing staff? The administrative staff must be rolling in it 😂 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,257 Posted December 6 Share Posted December 6 (edited) 17 hours ago, der Berliner said: TM says that we received ... - Euro 2m for Lammers - Euro 590k for Cantwell - Euro 360k for Wright ... and I have no reason to doubt them. What might be the case is that we receive some money in instalments (Lammers, most likely). No, it isn't the case. Read the accounts, it is actually worse than what I have seen reported since the AGM. Worse, because it also includes 4 outgoing loans, eg. any loan fee for Ben Davies. When you compare the 810K to the over 13 million figure spent in the summer window (Connor Barron fee still TBD and paid). Add in the lack of the 5M€ CL play off loss comfort for 24/25, further payments to Hampden, no COVID insurance payment or sale of car park....then the next set of figures 11 months down the line are shaping up to be another major loss. Edited December 6 by buster. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,651 Posted December 6 Author Share Posted December 6 The Lammers figures given to the media (or at least allowed to propagate through them) would have included the money saved on wages to try and avoid embarrassment over any fees (or lack thereof). Same would have been the case with Goldson and I'd fancy the same will happen again across the next two windows as we look to get rid of more surplus talent such as Propper. Effectively we'll be agreeing to release players as we can't attract suitable offers and will agree termination deals with other clubs to effectively take on their wages. Some of us may have been blindsided with this fiscal strategy in the summer. We won't be again. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,257 Posted December 6 Share Posted December 6 6 minutes ago, Frankie said: The Lammers figures given to the media (or at least allowed to propagate through them) would have included the money saved on wages to try and avoid embarrassment over any fees (or lack thereof). Same would have been the case with Goldson and I'd fancy the same will happen again across the next two windows as we look to get rid of more surplus talent such as Propper. Effectively we'll be agreeing to release players as we can't attract suitable offers and will agree termination deals with other clubs to effectively take on their wages. Some of us may have been blindsided with this fiscal strategy in the summer. We won't be again. We have been paying players off for decades. It is part of our 21st century DNA and is reflected in our financials. We buy players for top dollar. We expect immediate performance. We too often don't get it. We want an immediate replacement but forget the financial implications. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.