johnnyk 158 Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 Sorry but IMO that team is very average with too many run of the mill SPL players. it's all about opinions m8, your team with buffel in it would win bugger all IMO........... :cheers: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scooter657 0 Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 -----------McGregor------------- Whittaker-Cuellar-Webster-Papac ------------Thomson------------ ------------Ferguson------------ Burke-----------------------Gow ---------Boyd---Naismith-------- 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Sorry but IMO that team is very average with too many run of the mill SPL players. But it's the best XI or at least very close to it from the players in our squad. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Rankin Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 ____________McGregor____________ Papac____Cueller_____Webster__Smith Burke_________Ferguson___________Gow _____________Davis_________________ ______Boyd_________Darcheville______ I know darchey misses tonnes of chances, but he is a pest for teh defence. If he can square it to Boyd then we would be sorted. Gow needs a run in teh team as clearly we don't have any half decent left wingers. Davis is an attacking midfielder, so play him there. Ferguson can't go forward as much as we like to he can sit back and make the passes. Papac has ben sensational, too good to drop and Smith is the best fullback we have. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Stephen, There is no way Papac could play right back. He is far too one footed to be able to play over there. He has played well but I reckon he would be like a fish out of water at RB. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon 0 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 He got slated as a LB at first but has adapted and has even started getting forward. Maybe he could do RB the same. Is itg worth it though, an would WS chance bring in a youngster? I'd love him too. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 He got slated as a LB at first but has adapted and has even started getting forward. Maybe he could do RB the same. Is itg worth it though, an would WS chance bring in a youngster? I'd love him too. No way could Papac play RB. His right foot is for standing on and any winger would push him onto his right foot constantly. When not giving the ball away with a poor right footed pass he would be coming inside to his preferred foot and probable danger. Yes he may have adapted well moving from CB to LB but there is NO WAY he could adapt to RB, in my opinion. Some people can adapt better than others and whilst you are using his move from CB to LB as justification Jon, he moved from left central defence to LB, both of which utilise his preferred left foot. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 847 Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Agree with Craig, Papac isnt a RB. He doesnt deserve to be dropped even though it is the promising Steven Smith coming back. Papac has been one of our better performers in recent weeks. If your going to move him then play him in the middle with Cuellar. If he gets dropped but the likes of Adam and Ferguson dont then thats double standards. Those 2 have been rotten and poor respectively recently. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 If he gets dropped but the likes of Adam and Ferguson dont then thats double standards. Those 2 have been rotten and poor respectively recently. Not quite, Ferguson is our first choce midfielder and Smith is our first choice left back. Adam only gets a game when McCulloch or Beasley are not able to play left wing - which has been quite often. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 847 Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Not quite, Ferguson is our first choce midfielder and Smith is our first choice left back. Adam only gets a game when McCulloch or Beasley are not able to play left wing - which has been quite often. Nonsense IMO So just because someone is first choice means they should play whatever? Thats why there is such a split on Ferguson as it is, because a lot of fans know how inconsistant he is. If a player knows he is guarenteed to be picked then whats the point in him even training during the week? And if 3rd pick isnt doing the business he should continue ahead of those untried who may do better (Gow). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.