compo 7,014 Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago Righty ho and away we go a simple question this Sunday between seasons 65/67 and 73/74 Celtic did nine in a row between seasons 88/89 and 96/97 Rangers did nine in a row thinking about the these achievements which one has the most merit . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 5,980 Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago During Rangers’ niar there was fairly consistent, sometime stern, competition from Aberdeen and at times Motherwell and Kilmarnock and the occasional flicker from Hearts and at the end, celtic started to become a nuisance. Over their niar Hibs had a go, sometimes Dundee Utd and Aberdeen though not terribly seriously. I think Rangers did better in their niar than they did in ours so I conclude that Rangers’ niar has more merit than theirs. No bias or anything like that. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,038 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Wasn't around for their 9-in-a-row so can't really comment. During ours we were challenged by mostly Aberdeen including 91 where we had to defeat them in the last game of the season to clinch 3 in a row. What I'd say is I was disappointed that we didn't get 10. This could have been achieved if Terry Butcher hadn't broken his leg 1987/88 season when we finished a disappointing third. Also, we should never had lost the league when going for 10. Maybe it was Walter saying he'd be stepping down, maybe it was Walter player some of the older players, maybe it was the injury to Negri but still annoys me that we didn't win 10. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.