Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, compo said:

Then they’re all in the one boat losers 

Don't think it's quite that simple.  Sacking him would cost us a fortune.  There are no obvious replacements.  We only have skeleton staff at board level.  We knew this wasn't going to be easy.  We can't keep sacking managers ever Autumn.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

Don't think it's quite that simple.  Sacking him would cost us a fortune.  There are no obvious replacements.  We only have skeleton staff at board level.  We knew this wasn't going to be easy.  We can't keep sacking managers ever Autumn.  

The club set expectations in the summer with the downsizing and the new contract for the manager. Not sure what the support were expecting. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

Don't think it's quite that simple.  Sacking him would cost us a fortune.  There are no obvious replacements.  We only have skeleton staff at board level.  We knew this wasn't going to be easy.  We can't keep sacking managers ever Autumn.  

Who decided to extend his contract and why that’s a question that needs answering 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, compo said:

Who decided to extend his contract and why that’s a question that needs answering 

Bennett, with the board's approval, presumably. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CammyF said:

Terrible response from Clement to FLHAD question at press conference 

 

 

I liked the question being asked, and how he didn't back down when challenged by the manager.

 

But does anyone think the manager is going to come out and explain in any detail what his gameplan is and how we will beat teams? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CammyF said:

Terrible response from Clement to FLHAD question at press conference 

 

 

 

11 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

I liked the question being asked, and how he didn't back down when challenged by the manager.

 

But does anyone think the manager is going to come out and explain in any detail what his gameplan is and how we will beat teams? 

I posted this on the other thread:

 

Terrible question. He gave PC an out. 

 

PC has a point - too many sideways passes or too many long balls. Which is it? 

 

He should have just stuck to long balls. 

 

It was a good idea to ask about style, though. We don't get that often. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

Terrible question. He gave PC an out. 

 

PC has a point - too many sideways passes or too many long balls. Which is it? 

 

He should have just stuck to long balls. 

But we do both. He is right. We pass the ball about at the back, realise teams wont be drawn out into pressing us then play direct longer. 

 

I still think it would work better if we had Prso / Jelavic / Cousin / Morelos up front. But we don't.

 

He's also asked in the past why we are so easy to play through (one or two passes straight down the middle can cut us open). The manager didn't give an answer to it, just fluffed around it. The answer is pretty obvious to me that we play in a way that leaves us open but if players win the duels then it should be an issue. Soutter lost his on Sunday and we lost the game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.