CammyF 8,078 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 4 hours ago, BlackSocksRedTops said: The next month is going to effectively have a crucial impact on our whole season. The game tomorrow was already going to be hard but I've just seen that there are 50 miles an hour winds forecast during the time of the match. Great. I'm hoping those winds get me back from Florida in jig-time giving me sufficient time to get somewhere to watch the game 😄 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 4,314 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 Would a player, that we signed tonight, be eligible to play against Kilmarnock? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 850 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 (edited) The only irk Ive had with Clement is his resistance to change. We are crying out for more in the final third so why is a back 3 never an option. Even with a back 4 then flood the midfield with real midfielders, but don't rely on Lawrence getting a showboating moment every week as he is wasteful for 89 minutes. Edited October 19 by Gribz 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,078 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 55 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said: Would a player, that we signed tonight, be eligible to play against Kilmarnock? Would depend on where we are signing him from and / or his nationality. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,078 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 2 minutes ago, Gribz said: The only irk Ive had with Clement is his resistance to change. We are crying out for more in the final third so why is a back 3 never an option. Even with a back 4 then flood then fut 3 real midfielders in but don't rely on Lawrence getting a showboating moment every week as he is wasteful for 89 minutes. Whilst I agree with your assessment of Clement, Lawrence and Dessers are the only 2 players we have who look like scoring on a regular basis so, he has to start / play. Would Bajrami offer more in the 10 position? Maybe, but we have no options for wide left. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,600 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 I'd love to see a back-three, but I'd prefer a situational back-three. Nana in for Tavernier at RB. Nana would stay back to make a back-three with Jefte pushing forward on the left. This lets us use a proper winger wide right while also letting us revert to a back-four in defence. The 4-4-2 is best for pressing, too, which is more tricky to switch to if we start with a proper back-three. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,600 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 104 minutes, eh? Gave them every chance. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSocksRedTops 3,751 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 3 minutes ago, Rousseau said: 104 minutes, eh? Gave them every chance. Was it a head injury? Why so much time added on? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,929 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 1 minute ago, BlackSocksRedTops said: Why so much time added on? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,600 Posted October 19 Share Posted October 19 4 minutes ago, BlackSocksRedTops said: Was it a head injury? Why so much time added on? Celtic hadn't scored yet. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.