compo 6,865 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago Why not employ King as CEO and see if he's any good 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 7,756 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 10 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said: We dodged a bullet with that appointment believe me. Maybe we did, I said I wasn't convinced but we did offer him the role and the question remains why did a died-in-the-wool Rangers fan turn the role down. What happened to the other candidates that were interviewed? Assume we had a 1st, 2nd and 3rd choice? The longer this rumbles on, the worse it looks on the board especially given the other positions that remain unfilled. Edited 19 hours ago by CammyF 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 5,856 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 25 minutes ago, CammyF said: Would King be any worse / better than the current incumbents? King’s great weakness was his propensity to litigate lost causes. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,594 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 15 minutes ago, CammyF said: Maybe we did, I said I wasn't convinced but we did offer him the role and the question remains why did a died-in-the-wool Rangers fan turn the role down. What happened to the other candidates that were interviewed? Assume we had a 1st, 2nd and 3rd choice? The longer this rumbles on, the worse it looks on the board especially given the other positions that remain unfilled. The reasons he turned the role down were nothing to do with Rangers 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sutton_blows_goats 5,097 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 18 minutes ago, CammyF said: why did a died-in-the-wool Rangers fan turn the role down. I'm not convinced he is a Rangers fan at all. No one has come out the woodwork to talk about going to games with him, meeting him at functions etc like they have with John Gilligan. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,865 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 28 minutes ago, Scott7 said: King’s great weakness was his propensity to litigate lost causes. He must have cost the business a few bob in legal fees 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,594 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 7 minutes ago, compo said: He must have cost the business a few bob in legal fees Hence why Gilligan & Co don’t want him back 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 7,756 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, RANGERRAB said: The reasons he turned the role down were nothing to do with Rangers Really, what we're the reasons? Given the board offered him the job, would you conceded thar it was another case of the board selecting the wrong candidate? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 7,756 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 34 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said: Hence why Gilligan & Co don’t want him back Haha - the current board have cost us just as much, if not more. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 7,756 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, Sutton_blows_goats said: I'm not convinced he is a Rangers fan at all. No one has come out the woodwork to talk about going to games with him, meeting him at functions etc like they have with John Gilligan. He is a Rangers fan. Fan media confirmed this at the time he rejected us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.