Jump to content

 

 

[Official] John Bennett steps down with immediate effect for health reasons


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

We'll need to agree to disagree on NEH.

 

I go back to what I posted above: "I think it just requires us to utilise our capital better, rather than relying on more and more investment." We must become self-sustaining. We shouldn't be going cap in hand to the next Tom, Dick or Harry. 

 

I would vote for change, too.

 

I don't think King is that change.

But King has said he isn't interested in the long-term, he mentioned 2 years. 

 

Off course he wants someone to buy his shares, he's never hid that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CammyF said:

But King has said he isn't interested in the long-term, he mentioned 2 years. 

 

Off course he wants someone to buy his shares, he's never hid that. 

It's just another short-term fix then, isn't it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

It's just another short-term fix then, isn't it.

No - not if in that 2 years he puts in place the correct team and structure, then it would be 2 years well spent.

 

King divides opinion but the current board has ran its course. Its squandered untold millions (CL money, EL money, 2 record transfers (Bassey and Patterson) etc) and are having to make cuts everywhere. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CammyF said:

No - not if in that 2 years he puts in place the correct team and structure, then it would be 2 years well spent.

 

King divides opinion but the current board has ran its course. Its squandered untold millions (CL money, EL money, 2 record transfers (Bassey and Patterson) etc) and are having to make cuts everywhere. 

And you think he can do that?

 

I mean, we're making cuts because of King's policy of over-spending. :D 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

And you think he can do that?

 

I mean, we're making cuts because of King's policy of over-spending. :D 

At the moment, he is the only option (other than the status quo).

 

The board are making cuts due to THEIR overspending, let's not pretend otherwise. 

 

You don't King, that's your opinion / choice but you do want change, so who you backing? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, CammyF said:

At the moment, he is the only option (other than the status quo).

 

The board are making cuts due to THEIR overspending, let's not pretend otherwise. 

 

You don't King, that's your opinion / choice but you do want change, so who you backing? 

 

There are others out there(wealthy Rangers people) who’d come in & put money into the club but they’d want control first & that means buying out some of the current major shareholders. That’s the hard part.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said:

There are others out there(wealthy Rangers people) who’d come in & put money into the club but they’d want control first & that means buying out some of the current major shareholders. That’s the hard part.  

Are there? They were hardly fighting each other to get control of the club when it was in the toilet the  when we needed them to release the grip of the spivs.

 

I don't think King would be hard to deal with if anyone was interested in buying his shares 🤔 

 

It's a glorious thought and the ideal solution, that some mega-rich Rangers person will ride to our rescue but wouldn't bet on it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CammyF said:

At the moment, he is the only option (other than the status quo).

 

The board are making cuts due to THEIR overspending, let's not pretend otherwise. 

 

You don't King, that's your opinion / choice but you do want change, so who you backing? 

 

That's not a ringing endorsement. 

 

You just said they were cutting costs and now they're overspending? The overspending started with King. 

 

I just don't see King as a change. I think it's more of the same. 

 

I can only hope the board appoint an outside CEO and Chairman - something that King is against for some reason (quoted in The Herald). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.