Gribz 906 Posted October 5 Share Posted October 5 19 minutes ago, compo said: Chelsea have come into form of late I thought they would be a disaster but fair play to the Coach. Im not convinced they have been fully tested except Man City on the opening day plus they got lucky at Bournemouth. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 906 Posted October 5 Share Posted October 5 8 minutes ago, yuddie said: Inzaghi is a target for Utd apparently. Shame that because he's a brilliant manager. He isnt swapping Lombardy for Cheshire or Greater Manchester. Plus Inter are in very good shape. Man Utd dont actually have a world class player in their squad, Casemiro was at Real but not now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,184 Posted October 5 Author Share Posted October 5 Premier League chief claims the outcome of Lassana Diarra's case has 'EVERYBODY worried'.. and admits it could cause 'complete anarchy and chaos' to the transfer market as we know it Alex Conrad West Ham United vice-chairman Karren Brady insists the landmark ruling regarding the Lassana Diarra case 'has got everybody worried'. The European Court of Justice ruled on Friday some of FIFA's rules on player transfers are contrary to European Union legislation relating to competition and freedom of movement. The ruling is seen as crucial because it could make it easier for players to terminate their contracts and join another team. As a result, it could bring an end to big money transfers as players would hold all the cards, allowing them to pick and choose their next move. It has Brady fearing what it could mean for the market moving forward. The European Court of Justice handed down a historic ruling regarding FIFA player transfer rules on Friday The case was brought forward by Diarra over a decade-long dispute with a Russian club West Ham United vice-chairman Karren Brady holds grave fears over what the ruling will mean 'The outcome of the Lassana Diarra case has got everybody worried,' Brady wrote in a column for The Sun. 'But one thing is for certain: if a player has the right to terminate their contracts because they want to go elsewhere, then so would their club. 'And the result of that would be complete chaos and anarchy.' Brady added: 'If players can simply break their contracts and move around the world the entire system will collapse.' The Hammers vice-chairman also protested what the ruling would mean for clubs lower down in the English football pyramid. Several Premier League stars began their careers in the lower reaches of the English Football League (EFL), with some also breaking through at non-league clubs. Those teams often insert sell-on clauses in case the player goes on to even bigger and better after securing a move. Diarra argued he couldn't join a new club after Lokomotiv Moscow terminated his deal in 2014 Brady believes the ruling handed down will cause the entire transfer system to crash The ECJ's ruling is seen as crucial because it could make it easier for players to terminate their contracts Exeter City is one club who has benefitted from sell-on clauses as they were entitled to 15 per cent of Ollie Watkins' £28million move from Brentford to Aston Villa in 2020. The club also received a tidy windfall from Jay Stansfield's record-breaking £10m move from Fulham to Birmingham City in the summer. In her column, Brady used the example of non-league side Maidenhead United receiving £4m as part of West Ham's £40m deal to sign Max Kilman from Wolves. 'That's life-changing money for a non-league club but if there are no fees anymore that won't happen and the impact will be incredible.' Diarra's case was prompted when he signed a four-year contract with Lokomotiv Moscow in 2013 but the deal was terminated a year later after the former French international was unhappy with alleged pay cuts. Brady voiced her concerns for how lower league and non-league clubs would be impacted Ollie Watkins' move from Brentford to Aston Villa generated substantial income for Exeter City West Ham's move for Max Kilman helped non-league Maidenhead United earn £4million Lokomotiv Moscow applied to the FIFA dispute resolution chamber for compensation and the player countered seeking compensation for unpaid wages. The Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled in favor of the Russian club and the player was ordered to pay 10.5 million euros ($11.2 million). Diarra claimed his search for a new club was hampered by FIFA's rules stipulating any new side would be jointly responsible with him for paying Lokomotiv. The former Real Madrid player also argued that a potential deal with Belgian club Charleroi fell through because of the FIFA rules, and sued FIFA and the Belgian federation at a Belgian court for damages and loss of earnings of six million euros ($7 million). With the lawsuit still going through Belgian courts, the case was referred to the ECJ for guidance. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 906 Posted October 5 Share Posted October 5 The Bosman had an unreal impact, the "Diarra" could be the new one. It could result in clubs offering lower wages but players will have to remember if they are requesting moves then they wont get a full pay up on the outstanding contract. As for the smaller clubs Im pretty sure they can still insert some sort of clause with bigger clubs relating to QTY of games played plus request higher initial transfer fees. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,149 Posted October 5 Share Posted October 5 (edited) 9 hours ago, Gribz said: Crystal Palace 0-2 Liverpool Arsenal 5-0 Southampton Brentford 1-2 Wolves Leicester 1-0 Bournemouth Man City 2-0 Fulham West Ham 2-0 Ipswich Everton 1-2 Newcastle Aston Villa 3-0 Man Utd Chelsea 2-0 Nottingham Forest Brighton 1-1 Tottenham Liverpool will score three. Arsenal may be restricted to three. Brenttford will beat Wolves 2-0 maybe 3-1. You could be right about Leicester. City will concede at least one against Fulham but it won’t matter because they will score more. Ipswich might just get two against the Hammers so it will be a draw. Everton v Magpies is the most difficult to predict. 1-1? Villa 1-3 United, I’m afraid. Chelsea 4-0 Forest. BHA 2-1 ‘Spurs. EDIT. Half time at Palace 0-1 but I made my prediction before looking. No need to change. Three it will be. EDIT 2. Three it was not. That’s the Scouse for you. Let you down when you trust them. Edited October 5 by Scott7 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,184 Posted October 5 Author Share Posted October 5 Palace could have got a draw if their front players could finish 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaBoy 2,448 Posted October 5 Share Posted October 5 3 hours ago, Gribz said: I thought they would be a disaster but fair play to the Coach. Im not convinced they have been fully tested except Man City on the opening day plus they got lucky at Bournemouth. If he manages to sort the defence and swaps the goalkeeper Chelsea will be top 4 edging out Villa and should win the mickey mouse Conf league.... especially if West Ham can do it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,184 Posted October 5 Author Share Posted October 5 Nice goal from the toffees but offside 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,184 Posted October 5 Author Share Posted October 5 What a silly penalty to concede but Pickford saved it Mon the toffees 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,184 Posted October 5 Author Share Posted October 5 A draw at Goodison Everton deserved a point 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.