CammyF 8,079 Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 (edited) 49 minutes ago, Scott7 said: Never fear. Rangers are red hot on contract matters. There will be watertight completion delay clause with cast iron damages quantification. There you are - Rangers legal, red hot, watertight and cast iron. So, just to be sure, no chance of yet another court case Edited August 1 by CammyF 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,743 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 (edited) Well, I think I stopped loosing sleep about what happens behind the doors at Ibrox ever since SG arrived. What will be will be, no matter how much we wreck our brains. As the board/club is structured now, another Murray/Whyte/Green scenario won't be happening and those in power are all doing their best (whether they are PR beasts or not) for the club. 100 fans will have 101 different ideas of what goes wrong and/or can or must be done better ... and fair enough. My main concern remains with the team, the players and the tactics. Not that I can change much about the tactical shambles either, but it is something you can have "objective" and valid opinions on. And it is also enough to lose sleep over ... Edited August 2 by der Berliner 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,079 Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 Decent result if true. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,292 Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 37 minutes ago, CammyF said: Decent result if true. Source is not a good one. Settlement fee will likely be significantly higher. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,079 Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 1 minute ago, Gonzo79 said: Source is not a good one. Settlement fee will likely be significantly higher. That's why I said "if true". Tim's sites saying £6M so they probably know better. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,292 Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 3 minutes ago, CammyF said: Tim's sites saying £6M so they probably know better. You're the one constantly raging at the board, so the £6m would fit that better than £200k would. I'll take a guess at £3m, just for shits and giggles. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,929 Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 (edited) 5 minutes ago, CammyF said: That's why I said "if true". Tim's sites saying £6M so they probably know better. My understanding is that: Elite sued Rangers for c 9M GBP Rangers countersued for c3M GBP Hence, perhaps, the Timmy intel 9 - 3 = 6 Edited August 6 by Uilleam 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,079 Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 2 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said: You're the one constantly raging at the board, so the £6m would fit that better than £200k would. I'll take a guess at £3m, just for shits and giggles. That's some mental gymnastics right there. I'd much rather it be nothing, but would take £200K - I'd take anything significantly less than the £9M. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,079 Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 3 minutes ago, Uilleam said: My understanding is that: Elite sued Rangers for c 9M GBP Rangers countersued for c3M GBP Hence, perhaps, the Timmy intel 9 - 3 = 6 That's giving them too much credit - they wouldn't know 9 -3 is 6 😀 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,929 Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 2 minutes ago, CammyF said: That's giving them too much credit - they wouldn't know 9 -3 is 6 😀 They have calculators on their ScotGov funded smartphones. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.