Rousseau 10,605 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 3 minutes ago, Uilleam said: One General Relativity, and the other Special Relativity, I take it. Which one is which? (Asking for a hipster who failed the Physics paper at Largs.) You quoted it before I could correct my mistake. It's 'relationism'. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,929 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Rousseau said: You quoted it before I could correct it. It's 'relationism'. You mean like the Charltons, or the de Boers? Or Jim Forrest and Alex Willoughby? Now you are talking: imagine we had Brian and Michael in the starting XI..... Edited May 24 by Uilleam 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,605 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 7 minutes ago, Uilleam said: You mean like the Charltons, or the de Boers? Or Jim Forrest and Alex Willoughby? Now you are talking: imagine we had Brian and Michael in the starting XI..... I'm not claiming it's a new idea. Like all tactical styles it's based on what has gone before: Guardiola's style is based on the ideas of Cruyff and Michels, which was based on the Hungarian golden team, which in turn was based on the early Scottish passing game. These ideas are always tweaked and reshaped, though; different enough. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,929 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 16 minutes ago, Rousseau said: I'm not claiming it's a new idea. Like all tactical styles it's based on what has gone before: Guardiola's style is based on the ideas of Cruyff and Michels, which was based on the Hungarian golden team, which in turn was based on the early Scottish passing game. These ideas are always tweaked and reshaped, though; different enough. 'Relationism' is it? It sounds like a woke neologism for incest, and that particular, peculiar, peccadillo is, sadly, nothing new. But, for the avoidance of doubt: Merely because no cu nt on this forum, other than the Douanier, has heard of 'relationism', we may not assume that it is a 'New Thang'. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yuddie 1,693 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 34 minutes ago, Uilleam said: 'Relationism' is it? It sounds like a woke neologism for incest, and that particular, peculiar, peccadillo is, sadly, nothing new. But, for the avoidance of doubt: Merely because no cu nt on this forum, other than the Douanier, has heard of 'relationism', we may not assume that it is a 'New Thang'. Tbf I've heard of relationism and Fluminese using it. I'm pretty sure Guardiola and Madrid incorporate aspects of it into their game too. Although Guardiola is still more positional than relationist. I'll link an article on it: https://gameinsight.sport/relationist-football-a-modern-approach/ 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yuddie 1,693 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 If anyone is interested go and watch the CWC final between City and Fluminense, it'll give you an idea of what the ideal is like. Tbh I thought they were great to watch that game, albeit no poke. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,605 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 56 minutes ago, Uilleam said: 'Relationism' is it? It sounds like a woke neologism for incest, and that particular, peculiar, peccadillo is, sadly, nothing new. But, for the avoidance of doubt: Merely because no cu nt on this forum, other than the Douanier, has heard of 'relationism', we may not assume that it is a 'New Thang'. The name's not important. What is important is that it is a reaction against the strict positional play of Guardiola. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,605 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 4 minutes ago, yuddie said: Tbf I've heard of relationism and Fluminese using it. I'm pretty sure Guardiola and Madrid incorporate aspects of it into their game too. Although Guardiola is still more positional than relationist. I'll link an article on it: https://gameinsight.sport/relationist-football-a-modern-approach/ Yes! Brother! We must fight back against these dinosaurs! Together! 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,038 Posted May 24 Author Share Posted May 24 I wonder if the manager has the balls to say Tav you are the weakest link goodbye and play Sterling in that position . 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sutton_blows_goats 5,334 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 8 minutes ago, compo said: I wonder if the manager has the balls to say Tav you are the weakest link goodbye and play Sterling in that position . I dont think he has that option, the need is greater for Sterling at LB or in midfield. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.