Jon 0 Posted January 10, 2008 Author Share Posted January 10, 2008 Would I sell Hemdani or Boyd? (my question) Reluctantly it would be Hemdani as I think Thomson has shown so much recently. Who has shown they will score more goals than Boyd? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted January 10, 2008 Share Posted January 10, 2008 Hemdani is useful in the big games, Boyd on other hand? Irrelevant to the point being debated. Scot suggested Boyd should be punted as he's not a regular starter, often only making the bench. Hemdani regularly doesn't even make the squad. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 848 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Im a huge fan of Hemdani and think he should start every week but in the same case as Boyd, if he isnt playing and doesnt feature in Smiths plans then we should take an offer for him. Id probably rather sell Ferguson for 3 million plus than Hemdani for around 1.5 million then replace Ferguson with a creative attacking player and have Hemdani and Thomson sit in the midfield together. At the end of the day its Smith who picks and chooses so we also need to look at it from his point of view whether we should be keeping players or not. But at the moment he has half built a stronger team. We still have inconsistancies with him chopping and changing due to injuries etc the likes of Darcheville cant get going which is a shame. Beasley was beginning to come onto a game when he got injured. But we have a good base to step up to the next level in the next 12 months. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.