ian1964 10,721 Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil's advocaat 1,541 Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 24 minutes ago, Whosthedado said: Them Agreed, they are utter shite, I wish we had them next week. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,721 Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malangsob 1,264 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Rangers looked really bad for large parts of that one but our quality was just too much for them in the end. A win is all that matters. On to the semis. Hopefully we draw the scum. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,292 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 By the rules of the game it's a penalty but for me, it's not a penalty. It ticks the boxes to be a red card but let's look at what actually happened. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26th of foot 6,082 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 1 hour ago, Gonzo79 said: By the rules of the game it's a penalty but for me, it's not a penalty. It ticks the boxes to be a red card but let's look at what actually happened. Back during the festive period, I saw a Tweet referring to the attention seeking Michael Stewart, it might have been in the wake of the last old firm game? It went along the lines of : 'if I was stranded on a desert island with a packet of Jammy Dodgers and Michael Stewart, I would eat Michael and talk to the fcuking biscuits'. Kinda sums up dearest Michael. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,603 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Easter Road: 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,624 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 FWIW, I thought the second red should have been a yellow, but can understand why the ref gave it. It was excessive force but didn't think he was endangering an opponent, despite the various pics lol. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,292 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 9 minutes ago, Bluedell said: despite the various pics I'll never understand why people use still pictures to prove a point about an incident in a football match. The tackle would've endangered Lundstram if the perpetrator wasn't a big galoot. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil's advocaat 1,541 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Aye, pictures tell whatever story you want. The guy went in with both feet off the ground, and when your feet are higher than your arse, at the speed he was coming in at, you make the refs decision easy. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.