Gribz 848 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 IMO I don't think we can afford luxury players against Lyon on Wednesday :cheers: But we might need players who can make a difference when we may need them to :cheers: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 But we might need players who can make a difference when we may need them to :cheers: I agree but Buffel for me is not one of them m8 , we'll agree to disagree on this again :cheers: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ascender 352 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 The risk with Buffel, apart from his lack of starts, is that he was such a hit and miss player at the best of times. One day he looked like the real deal, the next he looked like a complete waste of space who'd rather be anywhere other than at Ibrox. Which is a shame as he's clearly talented, but in all his time here he's never really looked like coming good for us. If we need pace I'd be tempted to play Naismith tbh. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,720 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I don't think we'll see any surprises in our line up,Naysmith,Buffel and Burke will most probably be on the bench with the hope that they can come on and change our approach,should we need it 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I don't think we'll see any surprises in our line up,Naysmith,Buffel and Burke will most probably be on the bench with the hope that they can come on and change our approach,should we need it trust someone to be sensible :fish: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,720 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 trust someone to be sensible :fish: It's easy to be sensible for this game mate,WS can hardly be described as adventurous,quite right IMO for this game,I reckon Cousin will play up front with Whittaker in on the right mid :cheers: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 848 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 Whittaker in on the right mid :cheers: I hope not, we need our best available XI with talent and experience and players who can match Lyon. IMO Whittaker is nowhere near good enough for this game. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 It's easy to be sensible for this game mate,WS can hardly be described as adventurous,quite right IMO for this game,I reckon Cousin will play up front with Whittaker in on the right mid :cheers: i agree with them m8 and WS team selection most of the time but you still won't please the fans who want 2 or 3 up front. If we lose this game his team and tactics won't be good enough and I told you so will be said and if we win he got it right again :cheers: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I hope not, we need our best available XI with talent and experience and players who can match Lyon. IMO Whittaker is nowhere near good enough for this game. who is then m8 and please don't say Buffel 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 848 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 who is then m8 and please don't say Buffel Naismith, McCulloch and Buffel should start miles ahead of Whittaker. You cant honestly say you would prefer Whittaker at Right Mid to Buffel in an attacking role?? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.