juffery 0 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Is papac gonna be fit for Lyon? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,666 Posted December 5, 2007 Author Share Posted December 5, 2007 Is papac gonna be fit for Lyon? Should be as he only had a bit of flu,however have we discovered another rampaging fullback in Whittaker ?,to solve our LB position 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juffery 0 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Ah was that all it was. Big jessie poofbag cannae play football cos he's got a wee runny nose. Nveer saw Whittiker apart from his goal. Did he do well? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,666 Posted December 5, 2007 Author Share Posted December 5, 2007 Ah was that all it was. Big jessie poofbag cannae play football cos he's got a wee runny nose. Nveer saw Whittiker apart from his goal. Did he do well? He certainly came onto a bit of a game after he scored and looked quite comfortable,mind you Papac has done ok filling in,but Whittaker does give you more of an attacking option,which I feel we will need against Lyon 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juffery 0 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Have to say, what I saw against Stuttgart, Papac was rotten. But has done not bad for a CB playing at LB this season, but it's a position we must get sorted in january. No matter how well guys do filling in we need a anatural there. Even if/when Smith is back we at least need some cover! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Papac is a weak link in defence (and attack) so if we could fit in a "Hutton on the right" then that could improve the team immeasurably. Buffel has two chances of playing - "None and F*** all!" Adam will probably get the nod. Shame Novo is injured. An even bigger shame that Burke became a useless waste of money after he signed the contract he held out for. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TULLYTHETRUEBLUE Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Papac is a weak link in defence (and attack) so if we could fit in a "Hutton on the right" then that could improve the team immeasurably. Buffel has two chances of playing - "None and F*** all!" Adam will probably get the nod. Shame Novo is injured. An even bigger shame that Burke became a useless waste of money after he signed the contract he held out for. Took the words right out of my mouth Im glad you said it first they would have banned me for saying that :fish: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TULLYTHETRUEBLUE Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Nope, he played against Stuttgart did he not ? He played prior to that did he not ? And he isnt injured "every 7 to 10 days". See if you can find something positive to say about something... anything.... I think I might start nicknaming you Victor Meldrew :fish: Comment by Waldo today so eat your words........ :devil: "Since he's been here we have only had him in fits and starts. At the start of the season he had a troublesome Achilles and in the last six weeks or so we have been nursing him along with his hamstring. Looks like Im right again eh :cheers: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Comment by Waldo today so eat your words........ :devil: "Since he's been here we have only had him in fits and starts. At the start of the season he had a troublesome Achilles and in the last six weeks or so we have been nursing him along with his hamstring. Looks like Im right again eh :cheers: Thankfully you aren't right.... "fits and starts" doesn't equate to "7 to 10". Semantics perhaps, but still you weren't technically accurate. Touche. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TULLYTHETRUEBLUE Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Thankfully you aren't right.... "fits and starts" doesn't equate to "7 to 10". Semantics perhaps, but still you weren't technically accurate. Touche. I was bang on target if ye ask me...even more than Waldo :devil: I know its difficult eating humble pie but you will get over it till next time :fish: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.