Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Sima 75') - 3 Aberdeen

[CammyF 8,115]

3 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

We're already questioning it.

Really? So does Bisgrove deserve to be sacked along with Beale for not employing a DoF whether it be his or MBs choice not to have one? 

[Sutton_blows_goats 5,345]

1 minute ago, CammyF said:

Really? So does Bisgrove deserve to be sacked along with Beale for not employing a DoF whether it be his or MBs choice not to have one? 

Yes

[Bill 13,717]

52 minutes ago, CammyF said:

So the madness continues and we stumble from shit manager to shit manager. Happy days ahead then. 

That may be exactly what happens. Or not.

 

[Bill 13,717]

9 minutes ago, CammyF said:

Really? So how many more years in the wilderness do we accept before questioning the boards ability to make us the dominant force in Scottish Football? 

That's fine, as long as you're aware that questioning the board's abilities changes nothing

[Gonzo79 15,294]

10 minutes ago, CammyF said:

So does Bisgrove deserve to be sacked along with Beale for not employing a DoF whether it be his or MBs choice not to have one? 

Beale needs to go, yesterday.

 

Bisgrove needs to look to employ a man with good football knowledge high up at the club ASAP.

[CammyF 8,115]

5 minutes ago, Bill said:

That's fine, as long as you're aware that questioning the board's abilities changes nothing

It does and can change things as an example Bisgrove can and should he be sacked for pandering to Beale (your words) on the non-appointment of a DoF. 

 

Or should our board pander to a manager when it comes to establishing a competent footballing structure?

 

 

[CammyF 8,115]

2 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

Beale needs to go, yesterday.

 

Bisgrove needs to look to employ a man with good football knowledge high up at the club ASAP.

But we are told Beale has told Bisgrove NOT to employ such a person. If that's true, Bisgrove has to go.

[Whosthedado 1,685]

What this thread shows is what an absolute clusterfuck our club is. Shambles from top to bottom

[Bill 13,717]

1 minute ago, CammyF said:

It does and can change things as an example Bisgrove can and should he be sacked for pandering to Beale (your words) on the non-appointment of a DoF. 

Or should our board pander to a manager when it comes to establishing a competent footballing structure?

I'm bored with your over-emotional nonsense. Let me know when you've engineered Bisgrove's departure and reconstructed the board. Otherwise please howl at someone else's moon.

[CammyF 8,115]

6 minutes ago, Bill said:

I'm bored with your over-emotional nonsense. Let me know when you've engineered Bisgrove's departure and reconstructed the board. Otherwise please howl at someone else's moon.

Again, typical response when you've lost a debate.

 

It was you who said Beale had somehow hoodwinked Bisgrove into not appointing a DoF - something that you were using as a stick to beat Beale with. 

 

Now, if its true and our board are allowing Michael Beale to tell them how they should structure the footballing department, then we are in deeper trouble than any of us think. 

 

However, if someone uses this as a stick to beat Bisgrove with, it's moonhowlimg? 

 

You couldn't make this shit up, oh wait.... 

Edited September 30, 2023 by CammyF