Jump to content

 

 

Should Beale be sacked?


Should Beale be sacked?  

55 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Beale be sacked?


This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

I hate to call for any Rangers managers head but I've just come to conclusion that he has to go in order to try and salvage our season. Maybe it's a bit of hindsight but many of the summer business bothered me. To give this context, Im going to go back to last season. It seemed to me that Beale had developed the genesis of a playing style based on a high-press with Cantwell at the top of a diamond leading (and scoring). This was complimented by 2 split attackers, 2 in the middle, one at the base of midfield, wing backs providing width with a midfielder dropping in to cover. I liked this style and thought that this was going to be our blueprint for this season. Roll onto the summer...with Cantwell in the number 10 role leading the press did we need Sam Lammars? We also had Hagi who could play there. Lawrence was on the way back. God we even had young Lowry. Would that money spent on Lammars not have been better spent on more mobile wide attackers or central defenders? This is just one of many things that have been bothering me. Don't get me started on Danilo...

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlackSocksRedTops said:

I hate to call for any Rangers managers head but I've just come to conclusion that he has to go in order to try and salvage our season. Maybe it's a bit of hindsight but many of the summer business bothered me. To give this context, Im going to go back to last season. It seemed to me that Beale had developed the genesis of a playing style based on a high-press with Cantwell at the top of a diamond leading (and scoring). This was complimented by 2 split attackers, 2 in the middle, one at the base of midfield, wing backs providing width with a midfielder dropping in to cover. I liked this style and thought that this was going to be our blueprint for this season. Roll onto the summer...with Cantwell in the number 10 role leading the press did we need Sam Lammars? We also had Hagi who could play there. Lawrence was on the way back. God we even had young Lowry. Would that money spent on Lammars not have been better spent on more mobile wide attackers or central defenders? This is just one of many things that have been bothering me. Don't get me started on Danilo...

I agree with your point, but I actually think all the new forwards fit - except Dessers. 

 

Lammers' stats suggested a pressing forward, which fits a high press. I never thought he was a #10, which is where he has been played. Cantwell is far superior and had been very effective in that role. 

 

But, you're right, it has been a mess, in terms of set-up and use of players. It's a different front three every week!

 

I don't know why he hasn't built on some interesting ideas, re the diamond. Perhaps he can't, or doesn't know how?

 

I have other issues with recruitment, too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I agree with your point, but I actually think all the new forwards fit - except Dessers. 

 

Lammers' stats suggested a pressing forward, which fits a high press. I never thought he was a #10, which is where he has been played. Cantwell is far superior and had been very effective in that role. 

 

But, you're right, it has been a mess, in terms of set-up and use of players. It's a different front three every week!

 

I don't know why he hasn't built on some interesting ideas, re the diamond. Perhaps he can't, or doesn't know how?

 

I have other issues with recruitment, too. 

Why don’t you think Dessers fits?

I thought at last he was coming onto a game yesterday. He set up 2 goals although both disallowed in the first half.

Im more concerned about Danilo who’s too lightweight & Sima who looks lost to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, RANGERRAB said:

Why don’t you think Dessers fits?

I thought at last he was coming onto a game yesterday. He set up 2 goals although both disallowed in the first half.

Im more concerned about Danilo who’s too lightweight & Sima who looks lost to me

I don't think he's mobile enough. 

 

I agree that the others haven't done anything - or not been given a proper chance yet (i.e. Danilo) - but they do 'fit' in terms of style. 

 

I was just talking about style, not their effectiveness. None have been effective, IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy Halliday made a good point on SSB tonight. He said regarding Rangers starting XI yesterday only 3 were summer signings and had Barasic been fit only 2 would have played & one was the GK

Beales summer recruitment will soon cost him his job unless something dramatic happens and soon. Same as Warburton’s 2016 summer recruitment cost him his job

Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer the question you first have to decide whether it's likely there might be some advantage in delaying what to me seems an inevitability. In other words, have you seen anything in Beale's leadership that suggests a reversal of current misfortunes.

 

For myself, I see nothing to hang hope on and I would sack him now before even more damage is done. Basically, I think we have a windbag whose entire focus is on his own status.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.