BEARGER 1,830 Posted August 4, 2023 Author Share Posted August 4, 2023 Would the council give the go ahead for a pub under peoples homes? I know there are a good few in Glasgow but these were ok'd years ago. Times and rules change. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexscottislegend 2,325 Posted August 4, 2023 Share Posted August 4, 2023 On 07/06/2023 at 15:50, Bluedell said: Not on Copland Road How about Miss Cranston's on the Copland Road? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,627 Posted August 4, 2023 Share Posted August 4, 2023 17 minutes ago, BEARGER said: Would the council give the go ahead for a pub under peoples homes? I know there are a good few in Glasgow but these were ok'd years ago. Times and rules change. An interesting point. However what are they expecting it to be occupied by? A fast food joint? There's already a few of them. I could understand if there were a number of people wanting to take it on but presumably there isn't. Would they prefer it to lie derelict? It makes me yearn for the days of Michael Kelly when I see what's happening 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malangsob 1,264 Posted August 4, 2023 Share Posted August 4, 2023 55 minutes ago, BEARGER said: Glasgow City Council have today refused the creation of this new pub on Copland Road. A total of five reasons have been given for this decision, with the overarching being the proposals are not in-keeping with the city development plan. Ironically, the council just approved that site as the future location of Domination Dan's BDSM Emporium. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil's advocaat 1,541 Posted August 4, 2023 Share Posted August 4, 2023 The last thing we're needing in this country is more pubs tbh, Arfields or not. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,627 Posted August 4, 2023 Share Posted August 4, 2023 35 minutes ago, Malangsob said: Ironically, the council just approved that site as the future location of Domination Dan's BDSM Emporium. It was actually be OK if that was the case but the authorities in this country are as unenlightened on sex as they are on cars and alcohol, but given their approach to drugs, I guess they'd be happy for it to be occupied by dealers. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malangsob 1,264 Posted August 4, 2023 Share Posted August 4, 2023 1 minute ago, Bluedell said: It was actually be OK if that was the case but the authorities in this country are as unenlightened on sex as they are on cars and alcohol, but given their approach to drugs, I guess they'd be happy for it to be occupied by dealers. Yeah same here in our major cities. Crumbling messes. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,830 Posted August 4, 2023 Author Share Posted August 4, 2023 1 hour ago, Bluedell said: An interesting point. However what are they expecting it to be occupied by? A fast food joint? There's already a few of them. I could understand if there were a number of people wanting to take it on but presumably there isn't. Would they prefer it to lie derelict? It makes me yearn for the days of Michael Kelly when I see what's happening I would think that those who live above would prefer it empty to being a pub. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,627 Posted August 5, 2023 Share Posted August 5, 2023 I see the council have also refused the Easdales permission to build a boutique hotel in the derelict site of the Watt Bros store 🙄 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.