Jump to content

 

 

The Summer 2023 Rangers Transfer Window Rumours and Deals - Thread


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Graeme Ro55 said:

Agree, but I would add we need to be doing better at selling as well as buying. If the figures that have been banded about in the past for the likes of Morelos, Kent & Kamara were true we should have snapped up those offers. Keeping them has proven to be a mistake.

Those complaining about our failure to sell these players are generally the same that were moaning that these players were too important. 

 

They use the player trading model as a stick to criticise the club, but don't understand how it works. 

 

(I'm not saying you're one of them.) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

Those complaining about our failure to sell these players are generally the same that were moaning that these players were too important. 

preach GIF by Shalita Grant

(not pointing fingers spcifically, but generally, this is so true)

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

Those complaining about our failure to sell these players are generally the same that were moaning that these players were too important. 

 

(I'm not saying you're one of them.) 

Personally, I was never too keen on Kent or Kamara and would have grabbed at an offer, but I was a bit torn over selling Morelos, so I got that one wrong. Retrospect is a fine thing, eh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, DMAA said:

I hope not. Purely because that would be an absolutely insane decision. Swapping the man who never misses a game with John Souttar. 

Mate, you may need to go back to last season to see the chronology of what happened.

 

Goldson hadn't signed a contract and it was expiring.  Souttar was signed in January, when Goldson wasn't signing.  I suspect the club brought Souttar in on the expectation that Goldson wouldnt sign a new contract (Goldson himself said that he decided very late to sign a new contract).

 

It wasn't about the club WANTING to swap them, it was because they feared Goldson was leaving anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bill said:

Consider this. If Patterson had stayed, would he still be wasting away his career on the bench waiting for Tavernier to be dropped?

Well, honestly the proper move would have been to sell Tav and keep Patterson. The player reading model seems to have gone out the window.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PoohBear said:

Well, honestly the proper move would have been to sell Tav and keep Patterson. The player reading model seems to have gone out the window.

You don't pass up £12M.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.