Jump to content

 

 

[FT] Rangers 2 (Jack 61'; Roofe 94') - 1 Aberdeen AET


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

A sweeper-keeper would have dealt with both of their "goals", IMO.

Perhaps, but many (including me) went on about McLaughlin being so much better than McGregor with his feet. But we shut up when he had a brain fart at the Brendanbeu.

 

We can't afford a top goalkeeper. Whoever it is will have his faults. We'd be as well trying to develop McCrorie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

McGregor barely moved for their two goals.  We should play McLaughlin until we can get someone better in.  

It seems to be becoming a regular thing. It is as if he is modelling for his statue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, buster. said:

Perhaps, but many (including me) went on about McLaughlin being so much better than McGregor with his feet. But we shut up when he had a brain fart at the Brendanbeu.

 

We can't afford a top goalkeeper. Whoever it is will have his faults. We'd be as well trying to develop McCrorie.

McLaughlin is better, IMO. I would still prefer McLaughlin to McGregor. 

 

A sweeper-keeper is just someone who can burst off his line. There are many 'keepers that can do that. 

 

Of course, we can't afford to sign Allison; our choice will have flaws.

 

I've always argued that a sweeper-keeper would benefit this team greatly. 

 

I would love to see McCrorie get a chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Rousseau changed the title to [FT] Rangers 2 (Jack 61'; Roofe 94') - 1 Aberdeen AET

What's with the controversy around the Kent/Scales coming together? It looked like Kent was running and turned to get to the ball without realising a player was there and they clashed? Didn't seem anything in it when I was watching.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PoohBear said:

What's with the controversy around the Kent/Scales coming together? It looked like Kent was running and turned to get to the ball without realising a player was there and they clashed? Didn't seem anything in it when I was watching.

I had an exceptionally good view from my seat in the North stand.

 

Kent punched him in the face to assert dominance over him.

 

Scales was greeting afterwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PoohBear said:

What's with the controversy around the Kent/Scales coming together?

It's the yahoo way of focusing on an incident during our match in order to deflect from the definite penalty Kilmarnock should've had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.