MotM vs St Johnstone

[Rousseau 10,607]

What are your thoughts, folks?

[Frankie 8,562]

Genuinely couldn't pick one - they were all very poor.

 

Possibly Barisic (who's crosses were slightly better than Tav's) but he was culpable at the 2nd goal so no.

[26th of foot 6,082]

I have voted for Colak.

 

It is a protest.

 

Colak made some very good runs in the first half, we could not find him. He is a real deal finisher, get your head up and find him.

 

Think about it, we were awarded twenty(20) corners, that's an unhampered ball into the Saint's six yard box every three minutes. Did the Saint's Keeper have a save to make? The sole outcome for us was a Sakala header hitting the bar.

 

We have to make the law of averages work, find Colak.

[Bill 13,717]

It's another disagreeable task. Clearly no one deserves praise and everyone was guilty of something but since the whole point of this is to choose someone and abstaining is silly, it would have to be one of the Americans, so Sands for me.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

I thought sands did pretty well. 

 

Indeed practically the only players we have trying right now are the ones who might go to the world cup. 

 

 

Edited November 7, 2022 by the gunslinger

[compo 7,038]

its a hard one but I voted for Lundstram 

[onevision 1,569]

Sands here too but thought Tillman did well UP TO A POINT.

[Gonzo79 15,293]

1 hour ago, compo said:

its a hard one but I voted for Lundstram 

I thought he was one of the worst yesterday.   

[lenny3k 660]

24 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

I thought he was one of the worst yesterday.   

agreed

 

 

[Bill 13,717]

38 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

I thought he was one of the worst yesterday.   

I thought he was abysmal. God knows what’s happened there.