Miami investor still keen to buy stake in Rangers

[Bill 13,717]

3 hours ago, the gunslinger said:

Nothing to be gained from new investors. They can't put money in we are at the limit of FFP anyway. 

That's only because we had so many seasons with very low income. The FPP restrictions on Rangers will ease over the next few years as the average income over the assessment period rises. In any case FPP is more relaxed about money invested by significant owners.

Edited October 26, 2022 by Bill

[Bill 13,717]

18 hours ago, rbr said:

Aye because American investors have such a great record of success in the UK , even in the cash rich EPL they can't make it work , god knows the disaster it would be up here .

In that case, where would it be acceptable for investment to come from? The Middle East, SE Asia, Russia, China, Ayrshire?

 

I suggest to you the issue isn't where the money comes from but the conditions set out in the Sharesale Agreement.

[Sutton_blows_goats 5,335]

3 hours ago, the gunslinger said:

we are at the limit of FFP anyway

Think our wage bill is a big reason for that. Its too big. Investment may not help us improve on the park but it would help avoid us having to spend all our of cash on building NEH, fixing roofs, training ground maintenance, infrastructure projects etc and invest in the team a bit more.

 

I expect over the next year FFP wont be as much of an issue due to increased revenue with europe and transfers brought in

Edited October 26, 2022 by Sutton_blows_goats

[Bill 13,717]

16 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

Think our wage bill is a big reason for that. Its too big. Investment may not help us improve on the park but it would help avoid us having to spend all our of cash on building NEH, fixing roofs, training ground maintenance, infrastructure projects etc and invest in the team a bit more.

 

I expect over the next year FFP wont be as much of an issue due to increased revenue with europe and transfers brought in

FPP is largely a non-issue for Rangers, a distraction, certainly as far as new investment is concerned.

[buster. 5,186]

52 minutes ago, Bill said:

FPP is largely a non-issue for Rangers, a distraction, certainly as far as new investment is concerned.

The Family Protection Programme is a non-issue for the club but the new UEFA sustainability regulations (new version of FFP) certainly are an issue.

[Bill 13,717]

Just now, buster. said:

The Family Protection Programme is a non-issue for the club but the new UEFA sustainability regulations (new version of FFP) certainly are an issue.

🤣 It's not an important issue as far as new investment is concerned. Which I think is what I said.

Edited October 26, 2022 by Bill

[buster. 5,186]

9 minutes ago, Bill said:

🤣 It's not an important issue as far as new investment is concerned. Which I think is what I said.

That would depend on the view and intentions of any new investor.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

2 hours ago, Bill said:

That's only because we had so many seasons with very low income. The FPP restrictions on Rangers will ease over the next few years as the average income over the assessment period rises. In any case FPP is more relaxed about money invested by significant owners.

FFP exists to stop major investors throwing cash at clubs. 

 

 

[Franc Ergs 1,651]

On 20/10/2022 at 14:32, Sutton_blows_goats said:

 

 

https://krfcap.com

 

 

This whole thing stinks.

If this is KRF Capitals website , then it's just a whole lot of nothing .

 

The portfolio part in particular is just laughable.