ranger_syntax 4,422 Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 5 hours ago, buster. said: I note the full interview is available to RTV subscribers. Given subject matter, not the brightest move, IMO. What's your concern here? Should we pander to people that don't even subscribe to Rangers T.V.? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,400 Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 4 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said: What's your concern here? Should we pander to people that don't even subscribe to Rangers T.V.? Yes. It's about communication with fans and they put it behind a pay wall where only certain fans can access. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,257 Posted September 20, 2022 Author Share Posted September 20, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, ranger_syntax said: What's your concern here? Should we pander to people that don't even subscribe to Rangers T.V.? Part One was about fixing communication from club to support. Had it been about communication from club to RTV subscribers then I wouldn't have seen the irony. I get an argument that says you offer it first to your paying customers, fine. However, in this case that argument doesn't stand up. Edited September 20, 2022 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,299 Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 7 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said: Should we pander to people that don't even subscribe to Rangers T.V.? I'd imagine there are a fair few season ticket holders and shareholders who don't subscribe to RTV (including me), so yes. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 4,422 Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 3 minutes ago, buster. said: Part One was about fixing communication from club to support. Had it been about communication from club to RTV subscribers then I wouldn't have seen the irony. I get an argument that says you offer it first to your paying customers, fine. However, in this case that argument doesn't stand up. The result being that this seems to have dawned on them and the full interview was released shortly after part one. Bad news. Now people with no skin in the game will stick their oar in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sutton_blows_goats 5,477 Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 5 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said: Bad news. Now people with no skin in the game will stick their oar in. 51 minutes ago, Bill said: It was ever thus. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post forlanssister 3,114 Posted September 20, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted September 20, 2022 36 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said: Has it ever been outlined what the ROI is for rebuilding Edmiston House - Just wondering how we can justify what will likely be a large spend on what will essentially be a revenue stream of sorts but at what volume and will it result in investment in the first team over the longer term? If it doesn't then it seems like we are spending on a luxury we don't particularly need right now. We need to maximise income and Edmiston House is part of the strategy of doing that. I'm sure it will have a much more positive all round impact than many of our signings. Long term planning is something that should be welcomed after decades of ignoring that. Look where short termism took us to, that's why this Board are having to spend tens of millions on capital projects. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 1 minute ago, forlanssister said: We need to maximise income and Edmiston House is part of the strategy of doing that. I'm sure it will have a much more positive all round impact than many of our signings. Long term planning is something that should be welcomed after decades of ignoring that. Look where short termism took us to, that's why this Board are having to spend tens of millions on capital projects. Absolutely right. And much more still to do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,060 Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 It may be a minor point in my view but it is a little irritating that when they try to do the right thing, they contrive to miss the mark in how its released. Hoping part 2 has a little more substance though. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,257 Posted September 20, 2022 Author Share Posted September 20, 2022 (edited) 37 minutes ago, stewarty said: Edited September 20, 2022 by buster. mistake 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.