Jump to content

 

 

The Board Address Fan Concerns


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Bill said:

I think that was probably a mistake rather than any wish to limit who could see the interview.

A mistake, yes.

It was almost as if the recent dominant M.O. (squeezing as much revenue as possible from fanbase) naturally went the route of RTV subscriber only.

 

Then someone analysing the feedback realised the irony of a trailer finishing with a line about fixing communication from club to fans being only available to a few.

 

---------------------

 

If the fans want the club to grow on and off the pitch, they need to be prepared to pay top dollar and regularly. Short of finding & selling a Calvin Bassey every window, there appears no way round this.

 

Primarily, beyond basic survival, this is about keeping up with the neighbours and domestic success that opens the door to (the possibility of) CL money.

 

FFP will eventually limit our spending on salaries, transfer/agent fees, etc. to 70% of revenue.

 

Historically, at least as far back as I paid any attention to the accounts, we have been run in what could be termed as an unsustainable business model. We became used to buying our way out of problems. Too often, it was only buying in more problems. Kicking cans down the road was the order of the day. In 2009, a set of events was put in motion by Lloyds that would lead to Feburary 2012 (obviously on the back of Sir Duped's business model).

 

Our more recent losses, post March 2015 were projected and funded. Covid pulled the rug from under projected timescales and here we find ourselves looking at UEFA imposed FFP regulations to conform to.

 

In short, to operate at a competitive level with the neighbours, never mind Europe. We are somehow going to have to up those revenue levels and keep them there. That has to be paid for and the support are as John Bennett said, the lifeblood.

 

Lowering costs would probably mean lower salaries which points towards playing more of our own youngsters. Great, if they are good enough because it also boosts revenue (player trading model).

The only viable option ?

The supporter model would then need to incorporate patience. 

 

Why not, when the supposed saying that Rangers is all about winning (the League title) has gone by the wayside in the last decade or so. If we've grown acustomed to not winning it, perhaps it is time to try something else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by buster.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • buster. changed the title to The Board Address Fan Concerns
16 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

Yahoos will be rubbing their hands reading that, buster.  

Should we care about what they think ?

 

I think realism helps and there are challenging times ahead.

Not surprised that John Bennett said running Rangers is the biggest challenge  in business that he as faced. 

 

Part of that is managing expectation levels.

If you fuel them and don't deliver, rational two-way communication becomes more difficult.

IMO, better to keep the paying support onside with realism and have them buy into another strategic well communicated plan. Would hopefully mitigate constant fire-fighting and reactionary measures.

 

 

 

Edited by buster.
Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

If they're regularly laughing at us, it'll be less about caring and more about empty seats.  

They were laughing so much they didn't see '55' coming and during that 'hilarity' our support stayed loyal.

 

Cost of living may be a factor but that will be for everyone.

 

We failed to build on 55 (on field) and now we have to go again and the changing environment means a different approach is required.

Edited by buster.
Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

If they're regularly laughing at us, it'll be less about caring and more about empty seats.  

Just to add, when the hilarity was at its highest, only one club had to close the top tier.

 

So busy laughing, they forgot to attend their own games.

 

Edited by buster.
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, buster. said:

In short, to operate at a competitive level with the neighbours, never mind Europe. We are somehow going to have to up those revenue levels and keep them there.

Why is there such a financial disparity between us and them? Thier player trading model isn't as good as the red tops would have you believe. Thier participation in Europe is the same. Thier shareholders also take dividends IIRC. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

Why is there such a financial disparity between us and them?

Bigger stadium capacity, no problems with Mike Ashley and continued Euro revenue in the last decade are the three that immediately spring to mind.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.