Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

If we're supposedly going for the likes of Henderson, Kelly & McKay (I know, not exciting), I wonder if they now recognise a need for Scottish players, who gets what's needed to play for one of the big two and not give up at the first sign of a battle. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dragosani said:

If we're supposedly going for the likes of Henderson, Kelly & McKay (I know, not exciting), I wonder if they now recognise a need for Scottish players, who gets what's needed to play for one of the big two and not give up at the first sign of a battle. 

Not averse to McKay but that three options are lazy options. Kelly nowhere good enough if that's who we are seriously looking at for No1 then we're f*&ked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WorthingBear91 said:

If these figures are true(the Rangers ones) then our DoF has a lot of questions to answer. Too many older players with no sell on value earning too much money. Giving players in their thirties 4 year deals makes no sense

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said:

If these figures are true(the Rangers ones) then our DoF has a lot of questions to answer. Too many older players with no sell on value earning too much money. Giving players in their thirties 4 year deals makes no sense

You really have an axe to grind against Ross Wilson - or, I suspect, a DoF in general. 

 

Who got a 4-year deal in their 30's?

 

It's entirely normal for older or longer serving players to have the largest salaries. 

 

The only one that really annoys me is Matondo (if it's true). It's ridiculous to give a young, untested player that much. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

You really have an axe to grind against Ross Wilson - or, I suspect, a DoF in general. 

 

Who got a 4-year deal in their 30's?

 

It's entirely normal for older or longer serving players to have the largest salaries. 

 

The only one that really annoys me is Matondo (if it's true). It's ridiculous to give a young, untested player that much. 

Tavernier & Goldson have got new 4 year deals as far as I know. Both in their 30’s now. 
The DoF(at any club) has to take his share of responsibility & not be seen to be hiding be the manager  as ours appears to be doing at present. Wilson has to take his share of the blame for the poor recruitment in the last 2 transfer windows. I’m genuinely stunned if Matondo  is on £28k p.w. as well as all the other mistakes.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said:

Tavernier & Goldson have got new 4 year deals as far as I know. Both in their 30’s now. 
The DoF(at any club) has to take his share of responsibility & not be seen to be hiding be the manager  as ours appears to be doing at present. Wilson has to take his share of the blame for the poor recruitment in the last 2 transfer windows. I’m genuinely stunned if Matondo  is on £28k p.w. as well as all the other mistakes.

 

I don't think 4-year deals for Tavernier and Goldson are bad. They are both stalwarts, who have barely turned 30 - Goldson is 29 I think? - which is not old for defenders.

 

He does indeed, but you need to attempt to be objective in your judgement. 

 

Yes, it seems silly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.