craig 5,199 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Re-read the first line I quoted. It appears Barry has read it the same way as me and i don't see how it can be taken any other way. Fair point... I really shouldn't try to be psychic... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 850 Posted September 25, 2007 Author Share Posted September 25, 2007 No I can see it in 2 ways. 1) Whittaker would be more deserving over Hemdani on the right 2) Hemdani justifies a place (in general) in the XI over Whittaker 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Personally i don't think Hemdani has ever let us down so i find it difficult to see him treated in such a way. Hemdani would most certainly have offered more than Faye against Hearts. If it was the difference between win or lose we will never know. Even Charlie Adam sitting out for Faye is a joke. Faye may turn good but from what i have seen of him he makes Hemdani look like Asafa Powell. As i said before, Hemdani on the Bench would give us defensive and midfield cover. I think he should be in the team against teams who are willing to play, as Hibs, Hearts, Celtic but i will agree the 10 man defence teams make him an unneeded luxury. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gisabeer 409 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 I really should have included thompson when i made my comments about whittaker. thompson has done a decent job since he came but like his counter part i dont believe for a minute that any of the two of them should be ahead of hemdani in the selection stakes. We seem to be building the team around the two of them when other and better players in my opinion are being over looked. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trailio 0 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Firstly what's the point of chosing a loan player ahead of one of our own long term prospects IMO we should only chose the loan players as a last resort. When injuries/suspensions leave WS with no choice. So Faye should not be on the bench ahead of Hemdani, Adam, Gow or Burke. Secondly I actually think that SW complements AH very well on the right side. I agree he is not the most creative but the overlap option can be very confusing for opposition defenders. The fact that SW can comfortably cover for AH when he goes on his attacking runs forward and vise versa makes for a more secure unit. The longer they play together IMO this could become quite an interesting partnership. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Hemdani would most certainly have offered more than Faye against Hearts. I think he should be in the team against teams who are willing to play, as Hibs, Hearts, Celtic but i will agree the 10 man defence teams make him an unneeded luxury. Agree on both counts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 No I can see it in 2 ways. 1) Whittaker would be more deserving over Hemdani on the right 2) Hemdani justifies a place (in general) in the XI over Whittaker I see it that way too - but I think that Whittaker has under-performed and it is time to give someone else a shout in there, Novo for sure deserves a shot, and how about moving Lee McCulloch over to right and giving Gow a shot at LM ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 What about Darchville in this thread he would be my first choice striker every week and not coming on for only 20mins. Agree as well Craig, Nacho deserves a chance but would it not put a break on Hutton from making so many brilliant forward runs if Nacho was playing? He knows Whittaker will cover for him. And Whittaker leaves him room. Novo would get in his road more often. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 What about Darchville in this thread he would be my first choice striker every week and not coming on for only 20mins. Agree as well Craig, Nacho deserves a chance but would it not put a break on Hutton from making so many brilliant forward runs if Nacho was playing? He knows Whittaker will cover for him. And Whittaker leaves him room. Novo would get in his road more often. Possibly Pete. But I am not convinced Novo would necessarily get in Hutton's way. Novo is decent at tracking back too, actually when it comes to tracking back I reckon he may even be better than Whittaker - he just isn't a defender is the problem. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmck 117 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 i think there's a much better hemdani/thomson argument to be had than hemdani/whittaker. i like hemdani as much as the next guy, he was a standout in one of our poorest seasons ever, but walter smith is going to be very hard to criticse while his decisions are vindicated. dont understand why faye's anywhere near anything though when we have so many better options, but in walter we trust. till he fooks up. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.