MotM v Union SG (2nd Leg)

[Tannochsidebear 2,420]

Really difficult one, don’t think anyone stood out over the 90 mins, Lundstrum Lawrence Tillman all good for parts of the game but were MIA for other parts so for me the much maligned Borna put in some shift last night, especially with Kent clearly not fit and offering the usual out balls for him. Put in the crosses for 1st and 3rd goals as well.

[stewarty 2,028]

Lawrence for me also.  Was the creative spark we needed.

[Blue Moon 1,300]

Thought I'd already done this.  Must have forgotten to post.  I went for Lundstrum.  Could have been Lawrence or Tillman.

[rbr 1,256]

Tillman because he appeared both halves , Lawrence and Kent were both decent second half which unsurprisingly led to Borna having a much better game , people need to get off his back , when teams double up on Kent  he has no out ball , it’s ok for Arfield and Lawrence to make runs where they aren’t going to get the ball .

[the gunslinger 3,366]

30 minutes ago, rbr said:

Tillman because he appeared both halves , Lawrence and Kent were both decent second half which unsurprisingly led to Borna having a much better game , people need to get off his back , when teams double up on Kent  he has no out ball , it’s ok for Arfield and Lawrence to make runs where they aren’t going to get the ball .

Second half Lawrence went over there and helped out Kent. The main beneficiary was probably borna but it worked well. 

[Malangsob 1,264]

Lawrence is a killer.

 

Intense...so far, lovin this guy. 

 

 

 

[weebluedevil 1,239]

Tillman and Lawrence were the stand outs for me, but agree that it wasn't a pretty performance and everyone could have played better.  Borna may have provided the crosses that we profited from, but neither cross was of any quality, we scored due to opposition errors. Great result but performance level needs to improve dramatically and we need to cut out the poor passing - better or even similar teams would have punished us. 

Edited August 12, 2022 by weebluedevil