Uilleam 5,932 Posted July 31, 2022 Share Posted July 31, 2022 I haven't watched, or listened to, more than a few minutes of BBC Sport Scotland in years. From what I can gather, from reading on-line observations, and from comments of friends/acquaintances, its output is far from "drivel". What is described is, for the most part, too studied, and too infused with malice, to qualify for this accolade. It seems , almost, to approach the sinister. There is an agenda, which is nothing new, and I expect little or no change for the foreseeable future. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,038 Posted July 31, 2022 Share Posted July 31, 2022 32 minutes ago, Uilleam said: I haven't watched, or listened to, more than a few minutes of BBC Sport Scotland in years. From what I can gather, from reading on-line observations, and from comments of friends/acquaintances, its output is far from "drivel". What is described is, for the most part, too studied, and too infused with malice, to qualify for this accolade. It seems , almost, to approach the sinister. There is an agenda, which is nothing new, and I expect little or no change for the foreseeable future. The hatred in them is like seaside rock it goes all the way through accepting their apology never in a million years my reply would have been **** OFF 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 4,321 Posted July 31, 2022 Share Posted July 31, 2022 On 21/07/2022 at 15:21, MacK1950 said: To talk about "experts" these people are only so in their own egoistic minds you only have to listen to the drivel on MOTD spouted by Linekar and all. Must be experts. People up and down the country pay for it gladly. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil's advocaat 1,541 Posted July 31, 2022 Share Posted July 31, 2022 (edited) Flaw in your logic is folk paying over 150 quid a month tae listen tae some of the shite they have on cooncil telly. Edited July 31, 2022 by Devil's advocaat 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,087 Posted July 31, 2022 Share Posted July 31, 2022 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ted McMinnime 356 Posted July 31, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted July 31, 2022 15 minutes ago, CammyF said: Well it must have had an impact. I watched the Sunday edition tonight online and all those points listed were covered by Jonathan Sutherland with Marvin Bartley. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 8,087 Posted July 31, 2022 Share Posted July 31, 2022 1 hour ago, Ted McMinnime said: Well it must have had an impact. I watched the Sunday edition tonight online and all those points listed were covered by Jonathan Sutherland with Marvin Bartley. What was Sutherland and Bartleys take in them? FWIW I like Bartley and think he usually good with his assessments 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted McMinnime 356 Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 21 hours ago, CammyF said: What was Sutherland and Bartleys take in them? FWIW I like Bartley and think he usually good with his assessments Sutherland played it straight and asked the panel. Bartley and Lianne Crighton? 1)They concluded the linesman could not see the Livi player on the far side who may be playing Colak on. Very tight decision. 2) Bartley stated the bench decided to pull Cancar as he is a CB rather than FB , and was struggling in LB role, to negate a further yellow. ( No mention of revelation at today's PC that Walsh "advised" his removal!) 3) Panel agreed whistle had blown before ball crossed line so no case to answer on VAR. I like Bartley too. He was asked about our CL hopes as well, and seemed very genuine and positive around the need for us to be performing at that level. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,663 Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Ted McMinnime said: Sutherland played it straight and asked the panel. Bartley and Lianne Crighton? 1)They concluded the linesman could not see the Livi player on the far side who may be playing Colak on. Very tight decision. 2) Bartley stated the bench decided to pull Cancar as he is a CB rather than FB , and was struggling in LB role, to negate a further yellow. ( No mention of revelation at today's PC that Walsh "advised" his removal!) 3) Panel agreed whistle had blown before ball crossed line so no case to answer on VAR. I like Bartley too. He was asked about our CL hopes as well, and seemed very genuine and positive around the need for us to be performing at that level. Don Robertson was the ref on Saturday not Walsh. Couldnt help noticing that one of his assistant refs was David Roome on Saturday. was that him who failed to spot 3 offside Shellik players at their goal in the 2019 LC final? Edited August 1, 2022 by RANGERRAB 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,186 Posted August 2, 2022 Share Posted August 2, 2022 On 31/07/2022 at 21:44, Ted McMinnime said: Well it must have had an impact. I watched the Sunday edition tonight online and all those points listed were covered by Jonathan Sutherland with Marvin Bartley. Didn't watch the Sunday show but Saturday, yes. The Colak offside was in the highlight package (HP) but wasn't discussed post-match. The disallowed Livingston goal wasn't in the HP but was discussed post-match. Both were tight/contentious. The post booking foul by the Livingston player was on neither. Nor was the same by Glen Kamara. There have been many things to rightly point toward as far as BBC Scotland output is concerned but this isn't one of them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.