Sutton_blows_goats 5,329 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Gonzo79 said: From a purely economic perspective, there isn't much wrong with what he said. Marketing men don't give a flying f*ck about history or rivalry. We all want the club to maximise revenue and spend big because it means we'll sign better players and win things. For most of us though, the positives of this particular financial opportunity are heavily outweighed by the negative aspects (associating with scum and playing domestic matches overseas). Well i think from an economic perspective, it can be argued that taking part in this for a little cash boost is fairly short term in that 1) our direct rivals are also involved and will get the same (or greater?) cash boost 2) our direct rivals are embarking on partnerships with Australian broadcasters (https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/sport/19967743.celtic-seal-partnership-major-australian-entertainment-company/) and as such look to be one step ahead of us.. again 3) this is already being marketed down under as 'anges homecoming' and not Rangers V Celtic 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 we should have demanded the bigger cut to make this happen. Celtc need it more than us. Then maybe Biscgrove would have a point. i doubt celtc are making much out of online radio broadcasts of games. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,292 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, the gunslinger said: Celtc need it more than us. Whoever wins the league won't need this at all. It's odd that so many have been taken in by a yahoo scribe who says they're getting more than us. I was brought up to never trust a yahoo. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 Just now, Gonzo79 said: Whoever wins the league won't need this at all. It's odd that so many have been taken in by a yahoo scribe who says they're getting more than us. I was brought up to never trust a yahoo. No way are they getting more. Who said they were? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,292 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, the gunslinger said: Who said they were? Some yahoo 'journalist' who's grandparents were probably convicts, as well as everyone who believes his daft article. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sutton_blows_goats 5,329 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 5 minutes ago, the gunslinger said: No way are they getting more. Who said they were? I'm sure we will find out in the fullness of time. If Celtic are getting more it will inevitably be leaked by them in order to get one up on us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sutton_blows_goats 5,329 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 This is who we are enjoying a commercial partnership with for big anges homecoming. Astounding that they use a mans death to promote a betting partner and sponsor. Sick. Not surprising at all mind. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 4,320 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 3 hours ago, Gonzo79 said: ... It's odd that so many have been taken in by a yahoo scribe who says they're getting more than us. I was brought up to never trust a yahoo. To be fair the due diligence required to learn that was extremely onerous. Well, more work than tweeting anyway. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,289 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 I am actually more concerned that this is an unwarranted distraction from the main job in hand. I don't want us to do it either but let's be a bit more savvy about it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 14 minutes ago, Blue Moon said: I am actually more concerned that this is an unwarranted distraction from the main job in hand. I don't want us to do it either but let's be a bit more savvy about it. You might be right but it's not the supporters' doing and the solution is obvious. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.