Bluedell 5,627 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,948 Posted March 9, 2021 Author Share Posted March 9, 2021 Page Three (and, naw, no' that yin): 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,948 Posted March 9, 2021 Author Share Posted March 9, 2021 (edited) The Chairman's letter is pretty much on the money. Short of denouncing the liars as liars there is not much more he could have said. In any event, by allowing this correspondence out, any who choose to read it will be in no doubt who is practising deceit. Edited March 9, 2021 by Uilleam 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,627 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, Uilleam said: The Chairman's letter is pretty much on the money. Short of denouncing the liars as liars there is not much more he could have said. In any event, by allowing this correspondence out, any who choose to read it will be in no doubt who is practising deceit. Yeah, it really tears Sturgeon a new one. It's a great letter. Well done to the club for leaking it! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,018 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 That’s a very good letter except for the “Old Firm” reference. Sturgeon has no answer to this so she will ignore it and one of her running dogs will come out with something else. 55 is having a wonderful effect on our friends and a devastating effect on our enemies. Marvellous. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lintaugh 6 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Just a question, but why don't we see a header or signature on the leaked letter? Is this just an excerpt that we have been allowed to see? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,627 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, Lintaugh said: Just a question, but why don't we see a header or signature on the leaked letter? Is this just an excerpt that we have been allowed to see? I guess I may be some sort of journalistic code, in the same way as some of the names have been redacted. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,028 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Politicians really should refrain from commenting on things if they haven't a bloody clue what they are talking about. Or maybe this was the plan to deflect from the Salmond stuff? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,948 Posted March 9, 2021 Author Share Posted March 9, 2021 5 minutes ago, Lintaugh said: Just a question, but why don't we see a header or signature on the leaked letter? Is this just an excerpt that we have been allowed to see? At the bottom of the 3rd page, the writer says "Lastly"; I take it that p4 would be the usual salutations. I don't know why the letterhead is not on the first page of the reproduction. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lintaugh 6 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 9 minutes ago, Bluedell said: I guess I may be some sort of journalistic code, in the same way as some of the names have been redacted. Makes sense, though it would appear Rangers have nothing to hide so would've been nice to see the letter signed and dated. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.