Dave King to Sell Shares to Club 1872

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Jackson has just lifted this from the forums and used it to fuel his agenda along with many many assumptions. 

[buster. 5,200]

7 minutes ago, the gunslinger said:

Jackson has just lifted this from the forums and used it to fuel his agenda along with many many assumptions. 

Jackson is usually politically motivated in his editorial slant. In a way that reflects personal (source) relationships, or lack of, with those involved.

 

Edited December 7, 2020 by buster.

[26th of foot 6,084]

We must see Jackson for what he is.

 

Klaxon Jackson is a co-driver on the Boris Clown Car, competing with Noddy and Big Ears in the Clown Car Rally. Society should be thankful to Klaxon, Apollo 15's module landed on his face, subsequently the moon buggy was trialed on his visog for three months.

 

 

[Uilleam 5,948]

This piece from Jackson serves a number of purposes:

-classic deflection from the car crash at Piggery Place

-sowing dissension among the Rangers' support

-attacking his bete noire, Dave King, for whom he has displayed, consistently, personal animus for some time.

 

There are issues with the Club1872/Dave King "arrangement", but a man with transparent agenda is not the fellow to discuss them.

 

As for as the Dhaily Rhabble itself, I subscribe to the dictum that one should keep one's friends close, but one's enemies closer. 

Where appropriate, of interest, and/or concern, a copy and paste from it seems not unreasonable. 

However, it's no' ma ba', and it's no' ma bat.....

[Bluedell 5,627]

49 minutes ago, Uilleam said:

This piece from Jackson serves a number of purposes:

-sowing dissension among the Rangers' support

King and C1872 had already done that.

 

50 minutes ago, Uilleam said:

Where appropriate, of interest, and/or concern, a copy and paste from it seems not unreasonable. 

There's nothing new in the article and there's an element of clickbait about it, so copying it means that he has partly achieved what he set out to do.

[Uilleam 5,948]

9 minutes ago, Bluedell said:

King and C1872 had already done that.

 

There's nothing new in the article and there's an element of clickbait about it, so copying it means that he has partly achieved what he set out to do.

"King and C1872 had already done that."

Yes, but not everybody is aware of that.

At the very, very best, Jackson is stirring the pot.

 

"There's nothing new in the article and there's an element of clickbait about it, so copying it means that he has partly achieved what he set out to do."

One click, one cut and paste, allows any number of people to read it, to read any observations the cutter and paster and other readers may choose to make, and to opine on it themselves. This is hardly supporting the Rhabble and its editorial line, or adding to the gross no of views for advertising purposes; nor does it mean promoting or endorsing the personal views of its writer.

Exposure seems, to me, often better than disregard; and, as I said, earlier, know thine enemy. Better still, lay him bare for what he, or she, is. 

 

 

 

[Bill 13,717]

Suggesting that the divided response to King's share sale announcement is down to Keith Jackson is as unhelpful as it's unjustified. Besides, anyone who needs the DR to form their opinions for them probably isn't going to make much of a contribution anyway.

 

If the world wasn't full of intellectually weak people, rags like the DR wouldn't exist. Quoting it on here as if we would benefit from knowing what Keith Jackson is saying is demeaning. Let's keep it out.

[Gonzo79 15,294]

If we need Jackson or the DR to make an informed opinion about anything, never mind Rangers, I'd think a lemmings-like approach might be required. 

[Uilleam 5,948]

1 minute ago, Bill said:

Suggesting that the divided response to King's share sale announcement is down to Keith Jackson is as unhelpful as it's unjustified. Besides, anyone who needs the DR to form their opinions for them probably isn't going to make much of a contribution anyway.

 

If the world wasn't full of intellectually weak people, rags like the DR wouldn't exist. Quoting it on here as if we would benefit from knowing what Keith Jackson is saying is demeaning. Let's keep it out.

The divisions were there, clearly, before Jackson's attempt to keep the pot boiling. I am not suggesting otherwise.

 

I remain of the opinion that exposing the agendas of a -still- mass circulation redtop, and its writers, particularly when they are regularly antithetical to Rangers, is useful. 

 

[ranger_syntax 4,330]

2 hours ago, buster. said:

Personally, don't agree with it, but it's your baw and I won't do it again.

 

I recall one side of a particular struggle pushing a similar argument to ignore a certain media outlet a few years ago. In particular, a statement from Toxic Jack that also brought the "avoidance of doubt" into the lexicon of Scottish football.

Why not summarise it rather than link to it?

 

Few, if any, want to go to the Record.

 

Those that do deserve no help.