Jump to content

 

 

SPFL Season declaration challenged legally (ongoing discussion)


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Blue Moon said:

I wonder if UEFA will step in.

They are superiors of the SFA, not the SPFL, IIRC. In any case, the whole scenario would have to be put to them in a civilized and legally sound manner. If anything, they might say that unless anything is been cleared up, the Scottish national team and membership clubs will not take part in any UEFA event next season. That would set fire amongst the p(h)igeons.

 

IMHO, it is right that Rangers are not forerunners in this legal debate regarding the ending of the season, as we would be (and already have been) labelled as self-interested with regards to winning the title but not caring about the rest of the game - obviously not true, but we know the script. So it is important that those who now challenge the SPFL do it - obviously out of self-interest too. But that is their right and theirs greater than ours anyway. 

 

What needs to be done is a total removement of the cabal that effectively ruined the game in Scotland for years now and ruined the end of last season too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CammyF said:

I enjoyed reading that and agreed with almost all of it. I cant say I agree that it was rejected because it was Rangers who brought it forward. It was, IMO, rejected because it wasnt what celtic wanted. I doubt it would have been given any further discussion or credibility if it was Aberdeen that were saying it. This is, was, and always will be, about getting celtic any and every possible advantage they can get, and to hell with the rest of football if they are badly affected by it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, the gunslinger said:

Rangers can always raise an action in court to have Doncaster removed over this shambles after hearts win. They will have plenty of backing for it. 

If he survives that long.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tannochsidebear said:

I enjoyed reading that and agreed with almost all of it. I cant say I agree that it was rejected because it was Rangers who brought it forward. It was, IMO, rejected because it wasnt what celtic wanted. I doubt it would have been given any further discussion or credibility if it was Aberdeen that were saying it. This is, was, and always will be, about getting celtic any and every possible advantage they can get, and to hell with the rest of football if they are badly affected by it.

Yes but my blogs aren’t about them in any way 

 

It alludes to the fact and says basically we all know what has went on 

 

But if I write a blog that says it was all for them etc then it could borderline on looking mental and that lot would have a field day with personal criticism 

 

So subtle is key and has always been my style 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.