SPFL Season declaration challenged legally (ongoing discussion)

[RANGERRAB 3,677]

23 minutes ago, Bill said:

Doncaster is in his position by virtue of Celtic's patronage and sufferance. He will stay until he's told to go and he will go when he's told. This entire affair looks like coming apart in Peter Lawwell's hands and can only be contained by avoiding an independent investigation. Therefore, Doncaster may well be sacrificed on the condition there is no investigation and to keep the Celtic name in the clear. Celtic may well succeed in this but it looks like Rangers have enough to force the issue in court or at least to destroy the cabal Lawwell has worked so long to establish.

Doncaster will be the fall guy. His position is now  untenable 

[CammyF 8,119]

Quotes from Kenny Dalgliesh in today's Sunday Post 

"We’re almost two months into football’s lockdown and still we have no sense of direction from the SPFL.
The governing body’s hierarchy has been unable – or even incapable – of preventing bitter in-fighting to take over the Scottish game, with no end to the rancour in sight.
The biggest headlines have come from their war of words with Rangers.
This is something that may well have been festering since 2012, the year the Ibrox club was put down the leagues and told to start again.
That move really knocked Rangers for six, and it was four years before they made it back to the top flight. The club has kicked on since, and has made big strides on and off the park, with the appointment of Steven Gerrard as manager being the most significant move of all. But they still have a long way to go."

"The 200-page Ibrox report may well have lacked something really explosive, but it raised matters that need to be addressed and looked at closely. For this to be passed, it requires 75 per cent of the SPFL clubs to vote in favour.
It is down to them to cast their vote, based both on the Rangers dossier and their own personal experiences.
That’s why I found it a bit strange that the SPFL should be so dismissive, so quickly, of the report. Was it really their place to do that before the votes had been cast?
Overall, it has been extremely unpleasant. It is still a mess. Indeed, it is totally toxic."

[ian1964 10,724]

16 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said:

Doncaster will be the fall guy. His position is now  untenable 

To be replaced with another Separate Entity FC hand picked patsy??

[the gunslinger 3,366]

3 hours ago, CammyF said:

We shouldn't forget Chick Dungs performance this afternoon - the classic ; "how can it be an independent investigation if Rangers are paying for it"......

Actually he is right. The other clubs should decline that kind offer and pay their share. 

[RANGERRAB 3,677]

59 minutes ago, the gunslinger said:

Actually he is right. The other clubs should decline that kind offer and pay their share. 

These clubs don’t have the money. That’s what the SPFL game plan has been all along I.e. deprive them of their payments unless they toe the SPFL party line

[RANGERRAB 3,677]

1 hour ago, ian1964 said:

To be replaced with another Separate Entity FC hand picked patsy??

Hopefully not. Selection process needs to be transparent. No Nolan Partners

[ian1964 10,724]

Just now, RANGERRAB said:

Hopefully not. Selection process needs to be transparent. No Nolan Partners

Agreed.

They need rooting out, but that is a big task. I don't know who/how/why people are selected for these positions but all clubs need to be involved in the selection as opposed to Separate Entity FC hand picking placemen.

[ian1964 10,724]

What a clown, check this thread out!!

[Bill 13,717]

21 minutes ago, ian1964 said:

What a clown, check this thread out!!

The mouth is now completely disengaged from the brain.

[ian1964 10,724]