ian1964 10,724 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) Edited April 24, 2020 by ian1964 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,747 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Hehe ... Superscoreboard @ClydeSSB SPFL appointed Deloitte to carry out independent examination "into the factual chronology relating to Dundee FC’s return" to vote. They say it "identified no evidence of improper behaviour by SPFL personnel concerning the submission of the Dundee FC vote" 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,027 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Have they published the scope and findings? Did they speak to Rangers to assess the evidence they hold? If so, I'm assuming the report answers some of the questions i have. To begin with: Did they question Doncaster and other Board members why they were pressuring clubs to decide this when other options were available? Why was Lawwell involved when he;s not on the board? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26th of foot 6,084 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 I seem to remember Deloitte and Touche gave both RBS and Fred the Shred a clean bill of health, after conducting due diligence? Peter, Shifty, Rod, and maybe Neil have nothing to fear. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,027 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 6 minutes ago, 26th of foot said: I seem to remember Deloitte and Touche gave both RBS and Fred the Shred a clean bill of health, after conducting due diligence? Peter, Shifty, Rod, and maybe Neil have nothing to fear. I can't see Deloitte doing anything other than carrying out a review that is within the parameters that were set. Reputationally, it just isn't worth the risk not to. So what were the parameters? Why has it been announced at the conclusion only? Who did they speak to? Why has it just been selective elements of the report given to some friendly media outlets (the usual suspects)? This is a further can of worms and further underlines why Doncaster and McLennan are at it. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,027 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Another question would be: why Deloitte? I've no issue with them and believe they will act professionally. But how were they appointed? Who else was considered? What criteria were used to select Deloitte ahead of others? Again, from a reputational risk perspective, surely they could envisage being drawn into a shit storm of negative attention if they agree to perform such a seemingly skewed investigation? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,014 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Good questions, stewarty. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 That'll be the independent investigation concluded then and the entire affair put to bed. I think we can take it that no further questions will be accepted or answered. It's good to know there was nothing to be concerned about after all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.