ian1964 10,724 Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 Saturday 22 February 2020 The Scottish FA’s Chief Executive, Ian Maxwell, has received notification that the tribunal convened to hear the Claim for Wrongful Caution raised by Inverness Caledonian Thistle on behalf of James Keatings failed to implement its duties as per the Judicial Panel Protocol. Specifically, one of the panel members has advised that, despite raising no concerns throughout the process, they did not undertake their obligations with respect to the consideration of all the available evidence. While the Fast Track Claims process is by definition an appeal, and therefore not open to further consideration, none the less the Chief Executive and Presidential team, Rod Petrie and Mike Mulraney, are unanimous that the tribunal outcome cannot be considered competent in light of the disclosure from the panel member and that the input from that panel member must be withdrawn. With that in mind, and only in extremis based on the information provided by the panel member, the determination cannot be considered valid. Therefore, the Judicial Panel Secretary has been instructed to convene a new tribunal and a fresh date will be set in due course. The initial outcome is rendered invalid by the acknowledgement of a panel member of their failure to dispose of their duties in respect of section 13.13.4 of the Judicial Panel Protocol and, in particular, the following paragraph: The Determination of the Claim shall be made by the Fast Track Tribunal by examining and deliberating upon: (ii) all of the evidence and submissions delivered by the Claimant in support of the Notice of Claim. The Scottish FA upholds the independence of the Judicial Panel Protocol but cannot in this instance consider the tribunal verdict competent, based on the admitted failure of a panel member to adhere to the process as outlined. The panel member in question has subsequently been withdrawn from the pool of potential panel members for all future tribunals. https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/news/scottish-fa-statement-james-keatings/?rid=13929 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,009 Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 Can anyone understand that? I think I know what they mean but they haven’t quite managed to express it coherently. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,724 Posted February 22, 2020 Author Share Posted February 22, 2020 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,724 Posted February 22, 2020 Author Share Posted February 22, 2020 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,044 Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 2 hours ago, Scott7 said: Can anyone understand that? I think I know what they mean but they haven’t quite managed to express it coherently. Sounds like something Jim Farry would have said 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 3 hours ago, Scott7 said: Can anyone understand that? I think I know what they mean but they haven’t quite managed to express it coherently. Somebody didn't know how to understand and use 'exhuberance' as defined by Petrie and Mulraney. As a result they got fired and it was publicized using this legalese BS. Next case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,674 Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 The SFA make up rules they go. We know that from experience. The transfer embargo was one such example 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,724 Posted February 25, 2020 Author Share Posted February 25, 2020 19 hours ago, RANGERRAB said: The SFA make up rules they go. We know that from experience. The transfer embargo was one such example They changed the rules to deal with Rangers, then changed them again to deal with Hearts! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,378 Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 23 hours ago, RANGERRAB said: The SFA make up rules they go. We know that from experience. The transfer embargo was one such example The same as their referees(wind assisted handball). 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baillie1872 13 Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 Never the SFAs fault though ....... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.