Jump to content

 

 

[FT] Rangers 0 - 0 Aberdeen


Recommended Posts

We've had enough of banning everything because someone is offended by it, whether on our side or across the fence. The way we're going, nothing will be allowed to be said or done. It's OK to be offended, it's a human right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The sheep are a 'diddy' club and just can't stand their status. They obsess over Rangers night and day trying to conjure up a rivalry that doesn't exist. We have only one rival and it isn't them. Their diddy club status was in full view both on Saturday and following the last game at the sheep pen, both draws.

Draws they celebrated like a victories while we on he other hand treat this one in particular like a defeat. That's the difference between Rangers and a diddy club. A draw feels like a defeat while it's akin to a cup final win for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JFK-1 said:

The sheep are a 'diddy' club and just can't stand their status. They obsess over Rangers night and day trying to conjure up a rivalry that doesn't exist. We have only one rival and it isn't them. Their diddy club status was in full view both on Saturday and following the last game at the sheep pen, both draws.

Draws they celebrated like a victories while we on he other hand treat this one in particular like a defeat. That's the difference between Rangers and a diddy club. A draw feels like a defeat while it's akin to a cup final win for them.

Should we not be beating these diddy teams or are our diddy's as big as their diddy's 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, compo said:

Should we not be beating these diddy teams

Yes indeed we should be beating a team lying 19 points behind with a game fewer played and GD of 3 compared to Rangers 44. You disagree? Or think I might?

 

4 hours ago, compo said:

or are our diddy's as big as their diddy's 

I suspect some of them may be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Scott7 said:

A diddy team raises its game against champions and falters against other clubs.

 

Why does this definition make me nervous? 

They were about as good as they get, we about as poor as we get. They didn't raise their game as much as we lowered ours. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.