Paul Scholes

[craig 5,199]

On 22/03/2019 at 10:46, buster. said:

 

#DueDiligence #Gumption 

 

It won't work 100% of the time but it'll help with prevention.

 

Not exactly the same thing but a reasonable parallel,......... some used their napper and could see though Craig Whyte and Charles Green, too many couldn't and probably wouldn't get what I mean.  

 

No amount of due diligence will uncover lies.  It’s really that simple.

[buster. 5,185]

3 minutes ago, craig said:

No amount of due diligence will uncover lies.  It’s really that simple.

Some see through lies better than others #gumption

 

Bluedell/Daily Mail said that Scholes had concerns regards to possible interference in team matters prior to taking the job. In other words, there were sufficient reason that he wasn't sure he could trust the people involved.

 

Ultimately he made a bad judgement call and has to take responsibility for that, ...It’s really that simple,

 

 

Only a gullible fool goes through life believing everything he is told.

 

 

[Bluedell 5,624]

He was aware there were issues, was given assurances which turned out took be false and he walked away. I'm not sure why that's bad judgement. He's not a mind reader (unlike some, obviously).

[craig 5,199]

26 minutes ago, Bluedell said:

He was aware there were issues, was given assurances which turned out took be false and he walked away. I'm not sure why that's bad judgement. He's not a mind reader (unlike some, obviously).

It’s that world of perfection, otherwise known as hindsight.

 

it amazes me how pious people can get when they have known information subsequent to an event and act as if they’d have acted differently.