Jump to content

 

 

Annual results / AGM 27th November


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, ian1964 said:

Rangers lead UK table for ratio of match-day income to wages

 

The Gers have the highest percentage of all clubs with £95 of money that comes through the turnstiles going to every £100 of wages.

 

RANGERS have the highest percentage of match-day income going towards their wages in the UK.

According to Kieran Maguire – a football finance lecturer at Liverpool University – 95 per cent of Gers‘ money that comes through the turnstiles contributes to their wages.

In other words, £95 of money brought in from matches goes towards every £100 of wages.

Celtic come in at number six with 74 per cent with Hibs ranked third with 81 per cent.

Dundee United are narrowly behind the Light Blues in second with 90 per cent, while Hearts and Aberdeen are both in the top ten.

The Hoops, however, earn far more than their Old Firm rivals on match-days.

Celtic take in an average of £43.6million every home game compared to Rangers’ total of £23m.

Manchester United take in an astounding £109.8m with Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea, Manchester City and Spurs making up the top five.

Meanwhile, Rangers are set to upgrade Ibrox as the club’s director of football Mark Allen has revealed radical changes for the stadium.

Allen is hoping that refurb proposals will help Steven Gerrard’s side gear up for future home games.

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/3446710/rangers-income-wages-celtic/

Rangers take in 23 million per home game? Whit?

 

And what are the radical changes to the stadium? Just sounds like sensible reshuffling

Edited by BlackSocksRedTops
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BlackSocksRedTops said:

Rangers take in 23 million per home game? Whit?

 

And what are the radical changes to the stadium? Just sounds like sensible reshuffling

It's clearly a typo.  Should be per season, not per game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark Allen's interview suggests there are further plans for the stadium.  Only the surrounding area is mentioned specifically though.

 

How on Earth do the scum take in around twice as much as us over the course of the season (serious question)?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

Mark Allen's interview suggests there are further plans for the stadium.  Only the surrounding area is mentioned specifically though.

 

How on Earth do the scum take in around twice as much as us over the course of the season (serious question)?  

Is it based on league games only? Are they factoring in Europe?

 

If it's just league games that's baffling tbh as they very rarely get beyond 52/53,000 (unless it's a Rangers game)

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

Mark Allen's interview suggests there are further plans for the stadium.  Only the surrounding area is mentioned specifically though.

 

How on Earth do the scum take in around twice as much as us over the course of the season (serious question)?  

Maybe they are better at marketing their club than us we have to do better we need someone to sell our brand .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming the figures are primarily linked to ticket prices and attendances.  Our attendances and ticket prices are similar to theirs, as far as I'm aware.

 

As for referring to Rangers Football Club as a brand.  Leave that to marketing gurus (or gimps, as I prefer to call them).  McDonald's is a brand.  Nike is a brand.  We are a football club, a community and an institution (apologies for the rant).

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

Aye, that strikes me as rather unbelievable. 

Double match-day revenue sounds inaccurate but the number to ponder on from the accounts is that they pay nearly double the wages we do and that makes it very difficult for us to win over a 38 game campaign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, buster. said:

Double match-day revenue sounds inaccurate but the number to ponder on from the accounts is that they pay nearly double the wages we do and that makes it very difficult for us to win over a 38 game campaign.

Are you sure it's only double the wages ?  I could have sworn I read somewhere their wages were over 50 million whilst ours were 21 million in the latest accounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.