Celtic Boys Club manager 'stuffed banknotes in boy's mouth'

[the gunslinger 3,366]

they will fold their old co and pay nothing. 

[Bluedell 5,624]

1 hour ago, the gunslinger said:

they will fold their old co and pay nothing. 

You mean the plc? Don't think that's easy given that's the company that owns the stadium and has the SPFL membership, and is where all the investment is sitting.

[compo 7,030]

should all be stood against a wall and shot 

[the gunslinger 3,366]

45 minutes ago, Bluedell said:

You mean the plc? Don't think that's easy given that's the company that owns the stadium and has the SPFL membership, and is where all the investment is sitting.

they made dormant the company that owned celtc at the time of these offences when the bunnet took over i thought? Transferred over to pacific shelf. 

 

couldn't they just fold that?

Edited February 9, 2023 by the gunslinger

[compo 7,030]

20 minutes ago, the gunslinger said:

they made dormant the company that owned celtc at the time of these offences when the bunnet took over i thought? Transferred over to pacific shelf. 

 

couldn't they just fold that?

do you ever wonder why the bunnet sacked Burns 

[Bluedell 5,624]

9 minutes ago, the gunslinger said:

they made dormant the company that owned celtc at the time of these offences when the bunnet took over i thought? Transferred over to pacific shelf. 

 

couldn't they just fold that?

No, they didn't.

 

The company that owned Celtic was always Celtic plc. This company was formed in 1897 and was previously known as "The Celtic Football And Athletic Company Limited". Its name changed in 1994 to Celtic plc. It was the football club until a restructuring on 15/2/02 when "aspects of (its) trade" were transferred to Celtic F.C Limited . It continues to own the players (ie pays the transfer fees), Celtic Park and the 1/12 share in the SPL.

 

This would be the company that the court case would be against. It had £31m in its bank account at 30th June last year.

 

The Celtic Football And Athletic Company Limited was set up in 1994 and was previously Pacific Shelf 595 Ltd. It is not the football club despite its name. Not much goes through it. It's currently dormant. It was probably set up just to preserve and maintain the old name.

 

The other company I mentioned above is Celtic F.C. Limited. This company was formed in 2001 and was previously HMS (402) Ltd. It is a professional football club. It receives all the gate money, employs and pays all the wages of the players and other staff. It receives the TV income. It is the company that competes in Europe.

 

The whole "pacific Shelf" issue is a misnomer.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

12 minutes ago, Bluedell said:

No, they didn't.

 

The company that owned Celtic was always Celtic plc. This company was formed in 1897 and was previously known as "The Celtic Football And Athletic Company Limited". Its name changed in 1994 to Celtic plc. It was the football club until a restructuring on 15/2/02 when "aspects of (its) trade" were transferred to Celtic F.C Limited . It continues to own the players (ie pays the transfer fees), Celtic Park and the 1/12 share in the SPL.

 

This would be the company that the court case would be against. It had £31m in its bank account at 30th June last year.

 

The Celtic Football And Athletic Company Limited was set up in 1994 and was previously Pacific Shelf 595 Ltd. It is not the football club despite its name. Not much goes through it. It's currently dormant. It was probably set up just to preserve and maintain the old name.

 

The other company I mentioned above is Celtic F.C. Limited. This company was formed in 2001 and was previously HMS (402) Ltd. It is a professional football club. It receives all the gate money, employs and pays all the wages of the players and other staff. It receives the TV income. It is the company that competes in Europe.

 

The whole "pacific Shelf" issue is a misnomer.

Cheers Bluedell Succinct as ever. 

 

they aint getting out of it like that then. 

[RANGERRAB 3,653]

What action will the SFA take against them if they lose the class action?

[Scott7 6,002]

None.

[compo 7,030]

2 hours ago, RANGERRAB said:

What action will the SFA take against them if they lose the class action?

 

2 hours ago, RANGERRAB said:

What action will the SFA take against them if they lose the class action?

Sweet FA