BEARGER 1,830 Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 (edited) Nae decision, 7 man committee have asked both QP & SRU for further details of their proposals. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45344636 Edited August 29, 2018 by BEARGER 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,055 Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 Just picture the scene the first old firm cup final at Murrayfield and the football special from Glasgow Queen street they will be murdering each other before the train clears the platform. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26th of foot 6,084 Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 As a Principled Rangers supporter, I would refuse to attend MURRAYfield. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,055 Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 I say move it to the capital . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,294 Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 Just have a British national football side and sell Hampden to Aldi. Sorted. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,680 Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 (edited) The SFA offered QP £2m for Hampden(stop laughing at the back) QP want £6m. The SFA don’t have £6m.Not to mention annual maintenance costs. The SFA aren’t flush at the moment. So the choices now for the SFA if they move are hiring:- 1) murrayfield 2) San Giro 3) Ibrox 1) would be a massive step into the unknown. A 67k stadium which would only get filled for OF games and another stadium where fans too far from pitch 2) as I’ve said on here, structural issues with this stadium in the near future. 3) the ultimate nightmare scenario. Begging Rangers for use of Ibrox staring into the barrel of a gun springs to mind. Maybe a charm offensive with Rangers chairman might be a good start Edited August 29, 2018 by RANGERRAB 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,830 Posted August 29, 2018 Author Share Posted August 29, 2018 They are between a rock and a hard place, all of their own doing. They decided straight off that no other football ground would be used, it’s either Hampden or Murrayfield. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,680 Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 11 minutes ago, BEARGER said: They are between a rock and a hard place, all of their own doing. They decided straight off that no other football ground would be used, it’s either Hampden or Murrayfield. They’ll try & stay at Hampden one way or another.Murrayfield is too big a risk to take. If they left Hampden & went to Murrayfield & it didn’t work out they couldn’t go back to Hampden as QP would have sold it to developers by then as they’d need to repay £16m loans & grants. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,378 Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 Ref Murrayfield I attended a rugby game there and found the seating no better than Hampden.So status quo for me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,830 Posted August 29, 2018 Author Share Posted August 29, 2018 3 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said: They’ll try & stay at Hampden one way or another.Murrayfield is too big a risk to take. If they left Hampden & went to Murrayfield & it didn’t work out they couldn’t go back to Hampden as QP would have sold it to developers by then as they’d need to repay £16m loans & grants. You’re probably correct. They discarded the best outcome imo, i.e use other grounds. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.