Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, craig said:

It isn’t a 4-3-3 though.  It’s a 4-2-3-1 with McCrorie and Jack playing behind Windass, Murphy and Candeais 

Disagree.

 

Formations are fluid. It's a 4-3-3 as that's the base formation. It's where we start from. when we have possession in forward third it moves to a 2-1-4-3 and when defending in this game goes to a 4-2-3-1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, trublusince1982 said:

Disagree.

 

Formations are fluid. It's a 4-3-3 as that's the base formation. It's where we start from. when we have possession in forward third it moves to a 2-1-4-3 and when defending in this game goes to a 4-2-3-1.

Disagree.  At no point have the front “3” formed part of a 3 with Jack and McCrorie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.