colinstein 294 Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 nah.....all this against the club stuff is shite....they'll try to get as much pay as possible.......big deal ! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,724 Posted June 8, 2018 Author Share Posted June 8, 2018 Strong rumours Wallace pulled out of numerous squads injured, when he was fit! rumours as I say. Anyway they will do what they have to do and the club will do what they have to do!. It's SG era now and both these players will not be involved. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 Everyone is protected by employment law and rightly so. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffer 1,665 Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 The frustrating thing for me is that the club has been quiet about the incident and yet these two are complaining about their punishment. Knowing what went on, I really wish the club would just tell the supporters. I hope they do. The comments on this thread are understandable, but these two deserve these punishments. They were in the wrong (especially Wallace) and they should be punished as much as possible, even taking into account Wallace's excellent contribution to the club. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,830 Posted June 9, 2018 Share Posted June 9, 2018 I agree that their first appeal should be to their employer. In fact I have never known a company that did not have an appeals procedure. Would it even be lawful not to have one? At the very least it would leave a company in a difficult position. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted June 9, 2018 Share Posted June 9, 2018 17 minutes ago, BEARGER said: I agree that their first appeal should be to their employer. In fact I have never known a company that did not have an appeals procedure. Would it even be lawful not to have one? At the very least it would leave a company in a difficult position. I hate when an institution has to investigate itself as it rarely backs the victim. See BBC! Rangers have already done their investigation and that is their answer it is now time to move on to the next independent step. Unfortunately the SFA and SPFL are not an honest appeal centre but Rangers will have to go with their judgement. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,186 Posted June 9, 2018 Share Posted June 9, 2018 Mess we could have done without. The biggest issue is now the value of what is left on the cotract of Lee Wallace and mitigating any loss. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,624 Posted June 9, 2018 Share Posted June 9, 2018 8 hours ago, BEARGER said: I agree that their first appeal should be to their employer. In fact I have never known a company that did not have an appeals procedure. Would it even be lawful not to have one? At the very least it would leave a company in a difficult position. Perhaps they have appealed to the employer and this is the next step? However perhaps football rules are different? A "normal" employer would not be able to fine an employee in the way that Rangers have done. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuGers 477 Posted June 9, 2018 Share Posted June 9, 2018 Anyone got any inside information as to what actually happened? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,293 Posted June 9, 2018 Share Posted June 9, 2018 1 minute ago, StuGers said: Anyone got any inside information as to what actually happened? @Gaffer seems like he knows. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.